I think you mean "VMIDs to invalidate", not "VMIDs to reset". With that
fixed, the patch is
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling
On 2023-09-05 02:04, Christian König wrote:
Testing for reset is pointless since the reset can start right after the
test. Grab the reset semaphore instead.
The same PASID
On 07/09/2023 08:57, Christian König wrote:
Am 06.09.23 um 16:35 schrieb Shashank Sharma:
On 06/09/2023 16:25, Shashank Sharma wrote:
On 05/09/2023 08:04, Christian König wrote:
Testing for reset is pointless since the reset can start right
after the
test. Grab the reset semaphore
Am 06.09.23 um 16:35 schrieb Shashank Sharma:
On 06/09/2023 16:25, Shashank Sharma wrote:
On 05/09/2023 08:04, Christian König wrote:
Testing for reset is pointless since the reset can start right after
the
test. Grab the reset semaphore instead.
The same PASID can be used by more than
On 06/09/2023 16:25, Shashank Sharma wrote:
On 05/09/2023 08:04, Christian König wrote:
Testing for reset is pointless since the reset can start right after the
test. Grab the reset semaphore instead.
The same PASID can be used by more than once VMID, build a mask of VMIDs
to reset instead
On 05/09/2023 08:04, Christian König wrote:
Testing for reset is pointless since the reset can start right after the
test. Grab the reset semaphore instead.
The same PASID can be used by more than once VMID, build a mask of VMIDs
to reset instead of just restting the first one.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 7:30 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Testing for reset is pointless since the reset can start right after the
> test. Grab the reset semaphore instead.
>
> The same PASID can be used by more than once VMID, build a mask of VMIDs
> to reset instead of just restting the first