Re: [Amforth] Soft Interrupt Handlers

2013-04-19 Thread Enoch
Matthias Trute writes: >> I hope that you would be interested in the following AmForth >> development. I will send you the patch under a separate cover. > > I am interested. And regardless what you think of what > follows, I appreciate your work. > >> http://pastebin.com/sDGsKjhb Hello Matthias

Re: [Amforth] amforth-shell.py bugfix

2013-04-19 Thread Hannu Vuolasaho
> To: amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > From: i...@hotmail.com > Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:51:09 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Amforth] amforth-shell.py bugfix > I have two more developments planned for the shell, one easy -- one > tough... The tough one I mentioned already, which is, use a library

Re: [Amforth] amforth-shell.py bugfix

2013-04-19 Thread Enoch
Matthias Trute writes: > Hi, > >> I added an #include-once directive and let it default to "no" (current >> behavior). Also added was a program argument to change the default >> behavior if one so desires [me]. Testing done as well. >> >> http://pastebin.com/5Mfrvzdw > > Applied. And Thanks to

Re: [Amforth] Soft Interrupt Handlers

2013-04-19 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi Enoch, > I hope that you would be interested in the following AmForth > development. I will send you the patch under a separate cover. I am interested. And regardless what you think of what follows, I appreciate your work. > http://pastebin.com/sDGsKjhb A few remarks: Your patch include som

Re: [Amforth] amforth-shell.py bugfix

2013-04-19 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi, > I added an #include-once directive and let it default to "no" (current > behavior). Also added was a program argument to change the default > behavior if one so desires [me]. Testing done as well. > > http://pastebin.com/5Mfrvzdw Applied. And Thanks to Keith for discussion. btw: I agree