Re: [Amforth] 2 quick questions

2013-12-18 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi Enoch, > There's a reason for my asking. When I try to merge your new VALUE > implementation with my repository things stop working... The previous > implementation worked for me just fine. What has really changed is the parameter for the fetch/store methods inside of the values. That has cha

Re: [Amforth] 2 quick questions

2013-12-17 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Matthias Trute writes: >> 2. Can you please briefly explain the recent changes concerning values? >>f75ab2c * Variations of VALUE >>1bb0e1a * Finalize the API changes for VALUEs >>435621c * New internal API for values. > > Make the documentation and the working feature

Re: [Amforth] 2 quick questions

2013-12-16 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi Enoch, > 1. In amforth-eeprom.inc line #1: >.dw -1 ; EEPROM Address 0 should not be used >What use does the first cell serve? At least some atmega controller types explicitly stated in the data sheets that the first eeprom address may get corrupted for various reason. I never

[Amforth] 2 quick questions

2013-12-15 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, 1. In amforth-eeprom.inc line #1: .dw -1 ; EEPROM Address 0 should not be used What use does the first cell serve? 2. Can you please briefly explain the recent changes concerning values? f75ab2c * Variations of VALUE 1bb0e1a * Finalize the API changes for VAL