Re: [Amforth] Extended VM

2014-01-17 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi Enoch, > Your new extended VM words are interesting. Yet, they are not in the > emerging 200x standard, not in gforth, not in SwiftForth. Its probably too easy variable A : >a a ! ; : a> a @ ; : a@ a> @ ; : a! a> ! ; : na@ a> + @ ; : na! a> + ! ; \ pre-increment fetch/store :

[Amforth] Extended VM

2014-01-16 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Your new extended VM words are interesting. Yet, they are not in the emerging 200x standard, not in gforth, not in SwiftForth. Is the reason they did not become popular because they are for a-addr memory access (cell) rather than the more natural c-addr (byte) ? Thanks, Enoch.