Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-07 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi Jan, > Chuck, > > When I won't to run at a higher baud rate should I compile again? That would probably be the easiest way. Technically it is not needed however. The serial settings come from the VALUE baud (check with e.g. \ I use 38400 instead of 9600 amforth 4.9 ATmega1284P 16000 kHz

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-07 Thread Erich Waelde
Hello Jan, On 05/07/2012 04:29 PM, Jan Kromhout wrote: > When I won't to run at a higher baud rate should I compile again? Yes, when you want to change the baudrate, you need to edit your duemilanove.asm file .equ BAUD = 9600 reassemble amforth and flash it onto the controller again. Cheers,

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-07 Thread Jan Kromhout
Chuck, When I won't to run at a higher baud rate should I compile again? Jan Op 7 mei 2012, om 15:57 heeft Charles Summers het volgende geschreven: > You did very well in working through the problem. I'm thrilled that you've > got things running now. > Don't hesitate to ask me anything you thi

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-07 Thread Charles Summers
You did very well in working through the problem. I'm thrilled that you've got things running now. Don't hesitate to ask me anything you think I might be able to help you with. I will probably ask you some questions in the near future on running fig-forth on the microKim ;) cheers, -chuck On Mon,

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-07 Thread Jan Kromhout
Hi Chuck I am glad that the problem is solved. I am not in real time a programmer but a mechanical engineer who is writing optimization tools for dispatching powerplants. But my hobby is electronics, and the arduino. Cheers, Jan Jan kromhout Sacharovlaan 3 3223HM Hellevoetsluis-NL Op 7 mei 20

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-07 Thread Charles Summers
Hi Jan, Great to hear that you've got amForth running! I'm a software QA guy in real life, so I'd be very interested in seeing the steps you took on Windows tat did NOT work and the steps you took on OSX that DID work. It might save others from a similar fate :) cheers, -chuck On Mon, May 7, 2012

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-07 Thread Jan Kromhout
Hello, Thanks to all people how have response to my questions. I have now a running system. Special tanks to Chuck and Paulo. I have put the hex files and store them into the directory of avrdude under the arduino. Flashed to the Arduino under the OSX, and voila a working AMForth. Try the sam

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Jan Kromhout
Thank, I need only avrdude, because I compile all in avr studio 5 under windows. So I need only to transfer the hex files etc. with avrdude to my Arduino Uni. I think that the problems occurs with flossing, because I get a "working" hex files from a member. On his arduino it was working. So I wi

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Paulo Ferreira
On 2012/05/06, at 21:52, Jan Kromhout wrote: > Thanks Paulo, > > Could sommething going wrong with the burner? > Can you give me a hint how to do this on the OSX. > I have not yet the experiance. > > Cheers, > > Jan kromhout > Sacharovlaan 3 > 3223HM Hellevoetsluis-NL > My preference goes t

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Jan Kromhout
Thanks Paulo, Could sommething going wrong with the burner? Can you give me a hint how to do this on the OSX. I have not yet the experiance. Cheers, Jan kromhout Sacharovlaan 3 3223HM Hellevoetsluis-NL Op 6 mei 2012 om 22:27 heeft Paulo Ferreira het volgende geschreven: > > On 2012/05/06,

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Paulo Ferreira
On 2012/05/06, at 20:00, Erich Waelde wrote: > Hello, > > On 05/06/2012 08:12 PM, Jan Kromhout wrote: >> >> If I understand correctly the best is to buy some bare 328p chips, >> and flash them without tatching the lock bits. > > If fuses and "lock bits" refer to the same thing, then > no: "bar

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Jan Kromhout
Hello, Again thanks for the response. Yes I know that the boot loader is removed. Stil I am try now for about 14 days to get a running AMforth. These are my settings. I need the B5 otherwise I get errors. Running XP under Parallels on my IMAC Lion. Try also different computers, no good result!

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Erich Waelde
Hello, On 05/06/2012 08:12 PM, Jan Kromhout wrote: > > If I understand correctly the best is to buy some bare 328p chips, > and flash them without tatching the lock bits. If fuses and "lock bits" refer to the same thing, then no: "bare chips" and arduino boards are different things. I personally

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Jan Kromhout
Hi Matthias, Thanks for the quick response. If I understand correctly the best is to buy some bare 328p chips, and flash them without tatching the lock bits This is perhaps the issue that my Amfort is not won't to run. Cheers, Jan Op 6 mei 2012, om 19:16 heeft Matthias Trute het volgende ges

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi Jan, > When I take 2 new 328p with boot on it ( buy it recently from > original supplier) then when I read the lock byte the should be the > same? If my working version has an other number, because I did some > stupid things, I always can set it back to the origional value with > avrdude? I've

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Jan Kromhout
Hi When I take 2 new 328p with boot on it ( buy it recently from original supplier) then when I read the lock byte the should be the same? If my working version has an other number, because I did some stupid things, I always can set it back to the origional value with avrdude? Jan kromhout Sach

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread pito
Matthias, thanks - yes - the bootloader space is used by amforth .. do not ask me how much time I've spent tackling this, finally I thought my both chips are dead... :) ... the D9 did the trick.. > foo 123 ok Thanks, Pito - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA - Od: "Matthias Trute" Komu: "Everything around a

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi, > Hi, after a year I'm trying to run the latest version on atmega32 > (11.0592Meg xtal). Compiling and flashing is ok, I get working > system with one exception - I cannot add a new word - ie >> : foo 123 . ; > ok >> words > and it hangs here Cannot reproduce: > : foo 123 . ; ok > word

Re: [Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread Charles Summers
I had a similar problem with the uno until I saw I had left the flash locked after I out on the forth image. On May 6, 2012 7:51 AM, "pito" wrote: > Hi, after a year I'm trying to run the latest version on atmega32 > (11.0592Meg xtal). Compiling and flashing is ok, I get working > system with one

[Amforth] Issues with a word compile - flash or eeprom write issues

2012-05-06 Thread pito
Hi, after a year I'm trying to run the latest version on atmega32 (11.0592Meg xtal). Compiling and flashing is ok, I get working system with one exception - I cannot add a new word - ie > : foo 123 . ; ok > words and it hangs here, so I have to reflash eeprom, then I can see words again (without f