Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-10-02 Thread Keith Amidon
Thank you for writing amforth-shell. For me it has been a core part of AmForth and a key part of many of my projects. The combination of its reliability and AmForth recognizers meant I could automate sending both commands and data as Forth words over to an mcu running AmForth. Human readable and w

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-10-01 Thread Tristan Williams
On 30Sep23 11:35, Keith Amidon wrote: > On 9/30/23 05:25, Mark Roth wrote: > > Hello Keith. I'm glad you mentioned the shell (and that you wrote it in the > > way back when) because it had slipped my mind to get back to trying it. > > I've gotten so used to using e4thcom that the tool in the repo i

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-30 Thread Keith Amidon
On 9/30/23 05:25, Mark Roth wrote: Hello Keith. I'm glad you mentioned the shell (and that you wrote it in the way back when) because it had slipped my mind to get back to trying it. I've gotten so used to using e4thcom that the tool in the repo is just collecting figurative dust for me. Tristan

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-30 Thread Mark Roth
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 5:26 PM Keith Amidon wrote: > On 9/26/23 23:33, Mark Roth wrote: > > Hello AmForth'ers. I like to see this little blip of activity and hope > more > > of the less than usual suspects join in with their thoughts! > > I'm one of those "less usual" suspects, so l'll jump in. F

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-29 Thread Keith Amidon
On 9/26/23 23:33, Mark Roth wrote: Hello AmForth'ers. I like to see this little blip of activity and hope more of the less than usual suspects join in with their thoughts! I'm one of those "less usual" suspects, so l'll jump in. For those with long memories my one claim to fame in the amforth

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-26 Thread Mark Roth
Hello AmForth'ers. I like to see this little blip of activity and hope more of the less than usual suspects join in with their thoughts! On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:06 PM Erich Wälde wrote: > Hello all, > > good to see some interest in this project again. > > > > Mark Roth writes: > > > Good morn

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-26 Thread Erich Wälde
Hello all, good to see some interest in this project again. Mark Roth writes: > Good morning AmForth'ers (feel free to adjust the greeting with your RTC). >snip<< >> Tristan wrote, if I'm not mistaken >> >> The fact is that this project is still useful. >> >> I completely agree. AmForth

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-26 Thread Mark Roth
Good morning AmForth'ers (feel free to adjust the greeting with your RTC). disclaimer: I am going to cherry pick the commentary by Tristan for this post. You can safely assume that the single quotes are their's and any quoted quotes are mine unless noted. This thread is getting a little wound up a

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-25 Thread Erich Wälde
Hi Mark, Mark Roth writes: > Here is the clean link. > > https://github.com/CableGuy67/avra Thanks for pulling this together. I can successfully build the executable on debian 12, gcc 13.2 on a riscv64 machine. :) I would kindly suggest to increase the version number, or add some local suffix

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread Mark Roth
Here is the clean link. https://github.com/CableGuy67/avra On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 8:30 AM Mark Roth wrote: > > > > Talking of maintenance, I note that avra (on Sourceforge) hasn't been > >> > updated since 2019. Maybe it's completed? >> >> At least the home page points to https://github.com/Ro

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread Mark Roth
> Talking of maintenance, I note that avra (on Sourceforge) hasn't been > > updated since 2019. Maybe it's completed? > > At least the home page points to https://github.com/Ro5bert/avra which > has seen some commits since 2019. > There were some PRs for that one that led to a development branch

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread Malte Frank Gerdes
Martin Nicholas via Amforth-devel writes: > On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 17:04:01 +0200 > tristan wrote: > >> Fellow AmForth-ers, >> >> Perhaps it is time again to consider having a formal maintainer for >> AmForth. Back in May 2022 Erich stepped down [1] and put in place >> various resources that coul

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread Martin Nicholas via Amforth-devel
On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 17:04:01 +0200 tristan wrote: > Fellow AmForth-ers, > > Perhaps it is time again to consider having a formal maintainer for > AmForth. Back in May 2022 Erich stepped down [1] and put in place > various resources that could be potentially be used to maintain > AmForth (in addi

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread tristan
Hello Mark and fellow AmForth'ers, I am guessing you mean the SourceForge repo and the mailing list? Yes, my primary focus is the SF AmForth repo, website, community and mailing list. The fact is that this project is still useful. I completely agree. AmForth is quite special as an embedded

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-14 Thread Mark Roth
Hello, Tristan (and all the rest of the community). I am guessing you mean the SourceForge repo and the mailing list? I wish I could offer more help with this but I am at a loss with the assembly stuff. It would be nice to have the website info protected (amforth.sourceforge.net) since there is so

[Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-10 Thread tristan
Fellow AmForth-ers, Perhaps it is time again to consider having a formal maintainer for AmForth. Back in May 2022 Erich stepped down [1] and put in place various resources that could be potentially be used to maintain AmForth (in addition to those that already exist at sourceforge) To my knowled