Re: [Amforth] Why reStructuredText

2013-01-21 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, > Why reST? > > Its simple, its text based and the tool chain is at the > right places customizable. Did you ever dealt with > the docbook tool chain? I've spent fruitless hours with > it. with reST I could do more with far less work. > > And reST seem to have a future, its not the

Re: [Amforth] Why reStructuredText

2013-01-20 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi Enoch, > Why reST? Its simple, its text based and the tool chain is at the right places customizable. Did you ever dealt with the docbook tool chain? I've spent fruitless hours with it. with reST I could do more with far less work. And reST seem to have a future, its not the hype of the day.

[Amforth] Why reStructuredText

2013-01-20 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Why reST? Which editor do you recommend for anyone wishing to contribute doc? Thanks, Enoch. P/S Recommend patching the following to produce well formed "true": Index: core/words/usart-tx-poll.asm === --- core/wor