Sorry Matthias,
My mistake, it does check for zero length move.
Thanks, Enoch.
Matthias Trute writes:
> Enoch,
>
>> I believe that our cmove implementations require a test for zero length
>> move. Currently they don't.
>
> And here is what a small test gives
>
> (ATmega16)> s" ABC" pad swap c
Enoch,
> I believe that our cmove implementations require a test for zero length
> move. Currently they don't.
And here is what a small test gives
(ATmega16)> s" ABC" pad swap cmove pad 3 type
ABC ok
(ATmega16)> s" DEF" pad swap drop 0 cmove pad 3 type
ABC ok
(ATmega16)> s" DEF" pad swap drop 0
Hello Matthias,
I believe that our cmove implementations require a test for zero length
move. Currently they don't. Here's what RC2 says:
"""
17.6.1.0910 CMOVE “c-move” STRING
( c-addr1 c-addr2 u -- )
If u is greater than zero, copy u
"""
Thanks, Enoch.
--
