Re: [Amforth] Marker?

2013-10-10 Thread Michael Picco
Thanks Erich! That wasn't quite clear in the write-up. Having made that change, it's now working. Regards, Michael On 10/10/2013 1:02 PM, Erich Waelde wrote: > Hello, > > On 10/10/2013 09:48 PM, Michael Picco wrote: > > I noticed that the documentation regarding "Un-Doing > > Definitions" is

Re: [Amforth] Marker?

2013-10-10 Thread Erich Waelde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 10/10/2013 09:48 PM, Michael Picco wrote: > I noticed that the documentation regarding "Un-Doing > Definitions" is in error. > > The two forth source files referred to have different paths: > > The current paths appear to be: > > lib/ans9

Re: [Amforth] MARKER fixed

2013-05-12 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Matthias Trute writes: > I think that reparing marker this way is only half of the > story. IMHO marker became unmaintainable (at least > for me) so I changed it completely following the idea > from Michael: keep the whole EEPROM instead of > a structured dump of it. The eeprom co

Re: [Amforth] MARKER fixed

2013-05-12 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi Enoch, > Hello Matthias & All: > > MARKER was restoring word-lists in the reverse order. Sorry for that. > Fixed via a new > REVERSE word which is expected to be useful on its own. Indeed. See below. I think that reparing marker this way is only half of the story. IMHO marker became unmai

Re: [Amforth] MARKER

2013-05-05 Thread Enoch
"Michael Kalus" writes: > Hi Enoch. > > Here it is. I have no idea if it works with current amforth. > Some hints which amforth words have changed in versions >3.6 are > given in the srouce, there may be more since. > > I factored ,EE to copy eeprom to flash and POPEE to out it back to > eepr

Re: [Amforth] MARKER

2013-05-05 Thread Michael Kalus
Hi Enoch. Here it is. I have no idea if it works with current amforth. Some hints which amforth words have changed in versions >3.6 are given in the srouce, there may be more since. I factored ,EE to copy eeprom to flash and POPEE to out it back to eeprom - not that elegant notation. ; : ,ee

Re: [Amforth] marker

2012-10-21 Thread Enoch
Thanks Erich, MARKER does indeed work and it is essential -- we can't expect an enduser to use JTAG when upgrading appl. Regards, Enoch. ew.fo...@nassur.net writes: > Hi Enoch, > > > Quoting Enoch : > >> Hi, >> >> Can marker be fixed? > ... >> |S| 23|1+ dup @i to dp >> |S| 24|1+ dup

Re: [Amforth] marker

2012-10-21 Thread ew . forth
Hi Enoch, Quoting Enoch : > Hi, > > Can marker be fixed? ... > |S| 23|1+ dup @i to dp > |S| 24|1+ dup @i swap 1+ dup @i swap >r > |S| 25|swap over !e set-current > |E=set-current ?? -13 24 > /home/enoch/private/iobcan/amforth/lib/ans94/core-ext > Error: Error in line sent