Re: [Amforth] CVARIABLE

Hi Wis, > It may be a good practice to prefix any "cvariable" name with a > mnemonic string (e.g., "c_") to help avoid the troublesome behavior IIRC it is called Hungarian Notation. I'll add a link to the wikipedia article to the recipe. Matthias

Re: [Amforth] wordlists empowered

Hi Enoch, > In the best Forth tradition let this "autoscope" be initially a NOP and > allow the programmer to introduce whatever naming scheme he/she desires > via a subsequent IS. A better place for such a hook would be (CREATE) (same asm file). And the default should be the standard behaviour

Re: [Amforth] wordlists empowered

Hi, On 03/20/2013 11:29 PM, Enoch wrote: > Hello AmForth-ers: > > Did any of you put "wordlists" into a good use? yes. I use this to create a separate wordlist, which is used to parse a special source code structure. I need a special wordlist, because I need to *temporarily* "overload" the meani

Re: [Amforth] wordlists empowered

Hi, > Recognizers would be the way to go, I think. Thats an interesting point. Until now, recognizers are not considered part of the *compiler*, but part of the (outer) *interpreter*. That means, they are used to find the proper meaning of an *already defined* word, but they are not active *duri

Re: [Amforth] CVARIABLE

Matthias Trute writes: > Hi Wis, > >> It may be a good practice to prefix any "cvariable" name with a >> mnemonic string (e.g., "c_") to help avoid the troublesome behavior > > IIRC it is called Hungarian Notation. I'll add a link > to the wikipedia article to the recipe. But Leo Brodie is defin

Re: [Amforth] wordlists empowered

Erich Waelde writes: > Hi, > > On 03/20/2013 11:29 PM, Enoch wrote: >> Hello AmForth-ers: >> >> Did any of you put "wordlists" into a good use? > > yes. I use this to create a separate wordlist, which > is used to parse a special source code structure. I need > a special wordlist, because I need

Re: [Amforth] CVARIABLE

Hi. What about mnemonic conventions like .s .r .line ." xxx" or key? ?DO and such? Don't we already use such "unwritten laws"? Michael Am 21.03.2013 um 21:24 schrieb Enoch: > Matthias Trute writes: > >> Hi Wis, >> >>> It may be a good practice to prefix any "cvariable" name with

Re: [Amforth] CVARIABLE

Hello Michael, "Michael Kalus" writes: > What about mnemonic conventions like > >.s .r .line ." xxx" > > or > > key? ?DO > > and such? Don't we already use such "unwritten laws"? Wis was talking about giving an appropriate name to what cvariable *creates*. There is indeed the Hungarian