Re: [Amforth] Amforth-devel Digest, Vol 67, Issue 1

2014-04-11 Thread Keith Weisz
I fixed it. BLUF: At the top of my timer1 code, I inserted "decimal". I back tracked my code and found out that if I didn't load bitnames.frt, my timer1 code would behave correctly. I noticed that bitnames.frt had a "hex" declaration at the top. It led me to think that that declaration persist

Re: [Amforth] Amforth-devel Digest, Vol 67, Issue 1

2014-04-11 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi Keith, > I don't know if it is poor coding practice to not declare a base at the > beginning of the file, but I'll adopt that practice. That was ok until the number prefixes were introduced. I think that a general number base change is now no longer needed and it is reasonably fair to assume

Re: [Amforth] appl template changes

2014-04-11 Thread Enoch
Hello Mattias, Matthias Trute writes: > Hello Enoch, > >> Apologies for my insistence but couldn't you achieve the same objective >> of packing as many words as possible into the core via a macro call at >> each word that examines the current "pc" against "AMFORTH_RO_SEG" and >> switches "pc" do