From the GPLv2 license text ( http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html ):
The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making
modifications to it.
Because you are not editing the obfuscated code directly, this would still
be a violation of the GPLv2.
On Mon, May 5,
Andreas Wagner
andreas.wag...@lowfatcomputing.org
writes:
From the GPLv2 license text ( http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html ):
The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making
modifications to it.
Because you are not editing the obfuscated code directly, this