On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Matthias Trute <mtr...@web.de> wrote:

> In an ideal world, at least. I like forth more than
> assembly.
>

amforth is Indirect-Threaded -- appropriate for a device with not much
flash space, but lately a lot of speed critical words have been re-written
in assembly which is sometimes an acceptable tradeoff for time-efficiency
but it means I need to reflash amforth every time I forget something among
other annoyances.

I have been thinking this past weekend -- why don't we have a word like
"+dtc" or a special colon such as "dtc:" to enable direct threaded
compilation of FORTH code for select words.

-Andreas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel

Reply via email to