On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Matthias Trute <mtr...@web.de> wrote:
> In an ideal world, at least. I like forth more than > assembly. > amforth is Indirect-Threaded -- appropriate for a device with not much flash space, but lately a lot of speed critical words have been re-written in assembly which is sometimes an acceptable tradeoff for time-efficiency but it means I need to reflash amforth every time I forget something among other annoyances. I have been thinking this past weekend -- why don't we have a word like "+dtc" or a special colon such as "dtc:" to enable direct threaded compilation of FORTH code for select words. -Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel