Re: [Amforth-devel] Atmega 1284p

2010-08-14 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
As far as I was aware the largest (Memory device) in a DIL package was the 644p. If there is one better I would be interested. Especially if it is a drop in for the 644p but having more memory etc. Haven't seen one yet though. That is why Arduino Mega which is a 1280 although it is a surface moun

Re: [Amforth-devel] Atmega 1284p

2010-08-15 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
If it is available as a DIL 40 and a drop in for the 644p. I don't mind getting a couple and trying them in the minimalist board I have designed and built that emulates the Sanguino. On 15/08/10 08:46, Matthias Trute wrote: > Pito, > >> Hi, There is the atmega1284p available (128k flash, 16k ra

Re: [Amforth-devel] Atmega 1284p

2010-08-15 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
will publish it via my home web site and probably via RepRap too. Cheers Andy kirby On 15/08/10 11:49, a...@kirbyand.co.uk wrote: > If it is available as a DIL 40 and a drop in for the 644p. I don't mind > getting a couple and trying them in the minimalist board I have designed > and

Re: [Amforth-devel] Atmega 1284p

2010-08-16 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
Lol It was supposed to be mainstream about 2 years ago. Check out the forums on AVR Freaks. Got some on order, just waiting delivery, then we can have a play. On 16/08/10 08:19, pito wrote: > Matthias, > mind an average windoze user cannot run the provided python files > (I've tried python 3.x

Re: [Amforth-devel] Atmega support

2010-08-22 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
Thanks mathias I have just received a couple of 1284's and built a couple of boards up with them so should be able to try it out over the next week. Cheers Andy Kirby On 22/08/10 17:10, Matthias Trute wrote: > Hi, > > I've understood that not everyone wants to use the full toolchain > him/he

Re: [Amforth-devel] Atmega support

2010-08-22 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
ke a look over your sholder when you do "built a > couple of boards up" - video? How do you do it? > Michael > > > Am 22.08.2010 um 19:02 schrieb a...@kirbyand.co.uk: > >> Thanks mathias >> >> I have just received a couple of 1284's and built a

Re: [Amforth-devel] Atmega support

2010-08-23 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
gt; etchant!--A-better-etc/ >> >> Sorry I am not big on video. >> >> But hope these help >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Andy Kirby >> >> >> >> >> On 22/08/10 18:51, Kalus Michael

Re: [Amforth-devel] Atmega support

2010-08-24 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
On 24/08/10 19:21, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Kalus Michael wrote: > >> Hi Andy. >> >> Am 23.08.2010 um 13:40 schrieb a...@kirbyand.co.uk: >> .. >>> http://www.ruggedcircuits.com/html/mb324p.html >> >> Very interesting board. B

[Amforth-devel] Minimalist 644p and 1284p board.

2010-08-24 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
Guys I have now completed and published the designs for a minimalist DIY 644p and 1284p board. As well as building a couple, then tweaking the design a little more. There is an experimental clone facility as part of the design. Completely untried, but as the board was being designed I thought to

Re: [Amforth-devel] 1284p compilation

2010-08-27 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
Wow well done pito. That's one job sorted. On 27/08/10 20:38, pito wrote: >> words > TIMER3_OVFAddr TIMER3_COMPBAddr TIMER3_COMPAAddr TIMER3_CAPTAddr > USART1_TXAddr USART1_UDREAddr USART1_RXAddr SPM_READYAddr TWIAddr > EE_READYAddr ADCAddr ANALOG_COMPAddr USART0_TXAddr USART0_UDREAddr > USART0_

Re: [Amforth-devel] 1284p compilation

2010-08-27 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
OH something I forgot to ask. What crystal frequency are you running it at ?? Cheers Andy Kirby On 27/08/10 20:38, pito wrote: >> words > TIMER3_OVFAddr TIMER3_COMPBAddr TIMER3_COMPAAddr TIMER3_CAPTAddr > USART1_TXAddr USART1_UDREAddr USART1_RXAddr SPM_READYAddr TWIAddr > EE_READYAddr ADCAddr AN

[Amforth-devel] For the Butterfly Fans

2010-08-28 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
I saw this on thingiverse and thought of you http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3901 -- Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of n

Re: [Amforth-devel] Case sensitivity of amforth

2010-09-03 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
If I have to choose between "fast" or "ugly" then case sensitive being fast and beautiful it is. If I went with personal convenience and C# et al I would be running windows and certainly wouldn't be contributing to Open Source. Come up with a reasoned argument (other than personal convenience) th

Re: [Amforth] Release 4.4 tagged and published

2011-05-24 Thread a...@kirbyand.co.uk
Excellent, thanks guys. Hopefully I will get some time to give it a spin over the nexy couple of weeks. Think I will stick with case sensitive. Cheers Andy Kirby On 24/05/11 18:54, Matthias Trute wrote: > Hi, > > I've just tagged and published a new release named 4.4. > > Noteworthy changes