Can someone assist with the code required to set a flag based on the ASX index,
XAO. I want my buy signal to only operate when PDI(14)(MDI(14)for the XAO. Any
assistance would be appreciated.
Can anyone here pls convert the following ideas to afl's pls?
I want to buy a stock when its avg price is above short term (suppose 15 days)
weekly price and then ema cross over-
cond1= When cweekly ema of close of 15 days
ma1= ema ( c,10);
Buy=cross ( C,ma1);
Is there any way or code to
Thanks Ed! I am sure I will learn a lot after studying your code. Thanks for
sharing.
Best regards
Larry
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Edward Pottasch empotta...@... wrote:
hi,
attached again. Changed little thing with chart.
should be able to see it at www.yahoo.com groups
rgds,
The current versions of AmiBroker do not fully utilize multiple CPU cores. If
you are running optimizations, you can experiment with MCO in the files section
of this group to see whether multi cores will help in your situation.
Mike
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, zozuzoza zoz...@... wrote:
Hello,
Chart refresh is independent from data collection.
It means that plugin can collect even 1000 updates (ticks) per second
per symbol,
while chart will refresh 10 times per second.
If that happens, during 0.1 sec you will see 100 new ticks arrived and
displayed
on chart.
It does not make
Hello,
It was explained in the past. My test have shown that single core using
array arithmetic
fully saturates RAM bandwidth and single core already waits for RAM,
thus adding more cores
makes AFL running slower, not faster if data do not fit into CPU on-chip
cache.
Using more than 1 core makes
Hello,
I have run your code and results are pretty much the same in both settings.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
Dennis Brown wrote:
Hello Tomasz,
Below is some AFL I wrote to explore the speed difference between
Array and Loop operations. I wanted to explore a number of
Tomasz,
Thank you for looking at it.
On my machine, I get the following results:
1,000 Base cycle length:
Loop Overhead = 181us / 1000 bars
Loop Operator = 576us / 1000 bars
10,000 Base cycle length:
Loop Overhead = 240us / 1000 bars
Loop Operator = 1024us /
Hi. Can anyone help? I am backtesting a system which uses Buy,Sell,Short,Cover
variables,(TradeDelays,0,0,0,0) on close, and also stopTypeProfit(8.25%) and
stopTypeTrailing(5.25%). The problem that I am having is in backtesting. One of
the trades is a long position on the close, at $45.00, the
Tomasz,
I had a typo in the previous results. The 1,000 and 10,000 cases were
swapped.
I still can not explain the differences I am seeing. I have tried
rearranging my code in many ways and the differences remain about the
same, 2x more time for 10x shorter loop. There might be some
Tomasz,
Thanks.
I am starting to understand now because I have read a few of the posts on
refresh etc (thanks to Herman/Dennis .. who seem to be the leaders on this, and
others plus, of course, your good replies, here and there).
I seem to have moved on to AFL 201, without even noticing.
I
dear mike,
i understood where you want me to direct. for you reference i am giving full
afl for my system which works fine giving me two extra coloms of initial risk
expectancy/trade coloumwise. but when i try to change risk perameter as shown
in following afl i get blnak colom of initial
12 matches
Mail list logo