[amirc] missing command /sign ?

2001-02-26 Thread torrelli
Hi, I was very disapointed last night that the /sign command isn't implemented on amirc (it is on the irc clients built on an irc-ii basis at least) cause it's such a funny command. It's main usage is something like that 'hey I just found the /sign [your_zodiacal_sign] command' and

[amirc] Re: missing command /sign ?

2001-02-26 Thread amicon
On Mon 26-Feb-2001 5:44a, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: o it's ^such a funny command. It's main usage is something like that o I can see you get to smoke some spiffy stuff in france as well. Hahahaha BTW: thanks for the update =) John DR. John M. Hoyt / AKA Warren Peace - amicon.net

[amirc] Re: missing command /sign ?

2001-02-26 Thread Bob Maple
On Sun 26-Feb-2001 6:16p, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: d Let's go for the bugfixes first, then for the gimmicks. Or impliment that yourself in ARexx.. : Bob Maple (Brazilian) : It may be that your whole purpose in life : : bmaple at burner.com: is simply to serve as a warning to

[amirc] Slight buggishnesses

2001-02-26 Thread Carl Troein
Howdy. Thanks for the update, Olli. :-) Here are a couple of things I've runa across. Haven't tested in 3.5.9, but they're not reported as fixed, so here we go... I've encountered color codes that weren't numbers (one letter instead). They were rendered as colors when I had colors on, but

[amirc] Re: missing command /sign ?

2001-02-26 Thread Ian Kumlien
At Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:14:57 -0100 (GMT) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - said something about "[amirc] missing command /sign ?". I was very disapointed last night that the /sign command isn't implemented on amirc (it is on the irc clients built on an irc-ii basis at least) cause it's such a funny

[amirc] Re: Slight buggishnesses

2001-02-26 Thread amicon
On Mon 26-Feb-2001 5:13p, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: c I've encountered color codes that weren't numbers (one letter instead). c They were rendered as colors when I had colors on, but whith colors c turned off the letters weren't stripped. I reall seeing the letters c 'f' and' 'j' (!?). No