[AMRadio] Off Topic and Heated arguments

2006-10-14 Thread A.R.S. - W5AMI
Lets try to keep the heat turned down. I detect a little flame nipping at some. Brian - w5ami List administrator -- There is nothing more uncommon than common sense. -- Frank Lloyd Wright __ AMRadio mailing list List Home:

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread Jim Wilhite
The other alternative could be, no input to any band plan; AM is phone; I'll operate phone wherever my license privileges allow and deal with my adjacent frequencies on a case by case basis. Putting a band plan with AM related info on an AM only web site, means nothing, if the rest of the

Re: [AMRadio] Dial Glass

2006-10-14 Thread crawfish
I just e-mailed him. We need all the AM guys. Joe W4AAB - Original Message - From: A.R.S. - W5AMI [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:58 PM Subject:

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion gone off topic

2006-10-14 Thread Bob Maser
Tom, your discourse on the no code licensing was great. I have never looked down at a n/c Extra as being inferior, except in jest, but I can remember having one hell of a time getting my code speed up past 20wpm at the same time I had the theory down pat. They never seemed in sync. I never

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion gone off topic

2006-10-14 Thread Jim Wilhite
Some where around here I have a mid 1970s license manual. The last time I looked at it, the Advance question pool was about 75 questions and the extra had 90. As a former technical person, I liked the old tests because they did not ask me how long a VE or VEC had to forward paperwork to the

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion gone off topic

2006-10-14 Thread k0ng
I only got my extra so I wouldnt have to remember the band edges, now they moved them. What tudu ?? DE K0NG PS, I dont care if anyone only tested to One WPM, as long as they get on the Air __ AMRadio mailing list List Home:

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion gone off topic

2006-10-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob, Your reply is appreciated. One of my pet peeves is that this topic seems to always be presented in a shoot the messenger mentality. I did not write the rules but have to live with them. If anyone has any angst about this topic it should be referred to the FCC and ARRL as you mentioned, not

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread Brian Carling
Sorry Clay - I cannot grant your wish. DX stations all ove rthe world buy crystals from me. Besides I only have ONE crystal on 3790 kHz. Perhaps sanctions would work? (grin!) Brian, As an active AMer and 75M DXer, I request that you please not offer crystals within 10 KHz of the 75M DX

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread Brian Carling
Actually no, AM has been used in the region of 3837 kHz for some time, and down around 7160 kHz too - hardly the to of the band. Why do you think it is wrong? Considering the fact that you are outnumbered by 500 to 1 at any given time, I would think it wise to stay up at the top of each band

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread Brian Carling
From: Todd, KA1KAQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 500-1? I think you need to get on a bit more often, Bob. AM has made a huge comeback over the last decade, and the 'gentleman's agreement' you mention seems only to be respected by the AMers. Just check 3870 - 3890 any night, you'll hear

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread Brian Carling
From: Bob Maser [EMAIL PROTECTED] If AM is getting so popular, why aren't there any manufacturers producing any equipment? Look at the function switch on most modern HF transceivers, Bob. There is usually a position marked AM.

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread Brian Carling
I can see this is going to be a conversation like a lot you can hear on 75m SSB! NOt very deep - mostly more like: DID DIDN'T! DID TOO! Bob Maser in Tampa writes: Yeah, right. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Icom, Kenwud, Yeasu least). If AM is getting

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread Brian Carling
Date sent: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:30:27 -0400 From: Bob Maser [EMAIL PROTECTED] That is a question that does not deserve an answer. But... you did! __ AMRadio mailing list List Home:

[AMRadio] AM T SHIRTS

2006-10-14 Thread Bob
Hi Guys , I had some AM T Shirts made for the group here in Texas and still have some left over. The LOGO USED was the old TUNGSOL TUBE LGO with on the bottom AM GLOWS IN THE DARK. A Copy of the logo is on my website under the W1PE FORUM and go to the AM Page. They are a Dark Blue Shirt, No

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread W7CE
No problem Brian. In fact I need to order another crystal from you. My purpose was to make sure members of the group are aware of the long-established DX window from 3789 to 3800. It is officially 3790 to 3800, but has drifted down an extra kHz in the past few years (those DXers are are

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion gone off topic

2006-10-14 Thread Anthony W. DePrato WA4JQS
All this verbiage are my opinions on the state of hobby. Yours may be different, probably are. Have a good day, see on the bands for as long as we have them. Bob W6TR SNIP Well Bob: You said a mouth full and you are correct. I am one of those 20wpm extra's and was a general when all

[AMRadio] TS430 as VFO

2006-10-14 Thread Jack Schmidling
Is there any reason why one could/should not use a rice box as a vfo on a simple rig like the Knight T60 or any other for that matter. Assuming we get the output down to an appropriate level, it would seem like a neat way doing things. js -- PHOTO OF THE WEEK: http://schmidling.com/pow.htm

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread KB2WIG
no its not - Original Message - From: Brian Carling [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday, October 14, 2006 5:32 pm Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net I can see this is going to be a conversation like a lot

Re: [AMRadio] TS430 as VFO

2006-10-14 Thread k0ng
Hello Jack: My TS-430 works OK as a VFO. You should make a 5 to 10 Watt attenuator to insure that the output is terminated correctly. A better way is to use the Transverter jack (socket) on the back of the 430. The output level is only 50 mW and is 50 Ohms. The transverter output may not

RE: [AMRadio] TS430 as VFO

2006-10-14 Thread uvcm inc.
You can also use one on a broadcast transmitter Brad KB7FQR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Schmidling Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 4:43 PM To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service Subject: [AMRadio] TS430 as VFO Is

[AMRadio] An Idea for 15 Meters

2006-10-14 Thread Mike Duke, K5XU
Those of us who depend on the upper hf bands for much of our AM operation due to limited power or antennas are eagerly awaiting better conditions on 15 and 10 meters. Since 15 meters will become more useable first, and since the General allocation on that band will soon increase by 25 khz,

[AMRadio] WA3VJB KA1KAQ audio

2006-10-14 Thread A.R.S. - W5AMI
Some more recordings made from N. Central AR by me/w5ami. Paul, I just missed working you. Good to work you again Todd. We had a big group with a station in WY checking in as well. Paul/VJB: http://w5ami.net/ham_audio/WA3VJB_3.885MHz_10-14-2006_9_34_56_PM.mp3 Todd/KAQ:

Re: [AMRadio] TS430 as VFO

2006-10-14 Thread Jack Schmidling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A better way is to use the Transverter jack (socket) on the back of the 430. Guess I had better get out the manual. Have no clue what a transverter is. Good luck and be sure you are in CW mode (no Mics!!) How bout AM with the audio turned all the way down? CW

Re: [AMRadio] WA3VJB KA1KAQ audio

2006-10-14 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
Tough conditions tonight, Brian. Sounds at least as bad on your end, but surprisingly I was hearing you much better up here. Even Paul was down over last night. Looking forward to quieter times and some good, long haul AM. Working Tim in WY. was no small feat, weak signal AM work to be sure. 73

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread Jan Erik Holm
W7CE wrote: No problem Brian. In fact I need to order another crystal from you. My purpose was to make sure members of the group are aware of the long-established DX window from 3789 to 3800. It is officially 3790 to 3800, but has drifted down an extra kHz in the past few years (those

Re: [AMRadio] Phone band expansion

2006-10-14 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
On 10/13/06, Bob Maser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Plus, if he had half a brain, he would have upgraded to an Extra back in the late 60's, early 70's. It's sour grapes. How do you figure that, Bob? Someone prefers not to upgrade to a higher license to get a few (until recently) more kcs of