Brian, don't be too quick to dump the Harris rig. There are probably
a lot of parts in it you can use. Of course if it is working and
taking a lot of space you may be better off selling it intact to a bc
station looking for a back up rig.
If AM QSOs are slower it is probably because of the
On 4/26/2010 2:24 AM, Brian Zwiener wrote:
The Harris is next to impossible to convert, and would be extremely
inefficient and expensive to even run the filaments, not to mention it wants
120/208 3-phase power!
What model Harris is it? Sometimes you can get Rotary Phase Converters
.
Bill
From: kj4hyd kj4...@gmail.com
To: kf5...@arrl.net; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Mon, April 26, 2010 7:46:23 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The Art of Ragchewing
On 4/26/2010 2:24 AM, Brian Zwiener wrote
in the output stages to make
the thing cheaper to manufacture.
Bill
From: kj4hyd kj4...@gmail.com
To: kf5...@arrl.net; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Mon, April 26, 2010 7:46:23 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The Art
Hello AM enthusiasts. I think there is a fine art to ragchewing.
Because I sometimes struggle with it I wrote up a little article about
it. Hope you all enjoy it and I would be open to anything that might
be useful to add to it.
http://kx5jt.net/AM/QSO.htm
73, KX5JT
@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sun, Apr 25, 2010 1:54 pm
Subject: [AMRadio] The Art of Ragchewing
Hello AM enthusiasts. I think there is a fine art to ragchewing.
Because I sometimes struggle with it I wrote up a little article about
it. Hope you all enjoy it and I would be open to anything that might
: Re: [AMRadio] The Art of Ragchewing
On AM I enjoy QSOs using what you describe as a ragchew (longer
transmissions) roundtable *and* the fast-turnaround group conversations
. Most AMers do the long transmissions, I admit, but it should not be
considered the only way it is done on the mode
...@post.com
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sun, Apr 25, 2010 1:54 pm
Subject: [AMRadio] The Art of Ragchewing
Hello AM enthusiasts. I think there is a fine art to ragchewing.
Because I sometimes struggle with it I wrote up a little article about
it. Hope you all enjoy it and I would be open to anything
8:46 pm
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The Art of Ragchewing
On AM I enjoy QSOs using what you describe as a ragchew (longer
transmissions) roundtable *and* the fast-turnaround group conversations
. Most AMers do the long transmissions, I admit, but it should not be
considered the only way it is done
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The Art of Ragchewing
What do we talk about these days? I have not heard an AM transmission
here
in the PNW in about 4 years now.
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa.
Real Radios Glow In The Dark
he mode.
__
Our Main
-Original Message-
From: j...@k5see.com
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sun, Apr 25, 2010 9:13 pm
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The Art of Ragchewing
Great effort, John. I have enjoyed our QSO's and look forward to more
in the future. Lately, I have been striving for brevity and
conciseness
I don't particularly care for the fast TR type qso. I hear it mostly
in big groups but even though I currently run mostly modern gear, I
have to switch a couple of things and prefer longer transmissions
where I have a few seconds to check the carrier level and see things
settle down so I like the
@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sun, Apr 25, 2010 11:02 pm
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The Art of Ragchewing
I don't particularly care for the fast TR type qso. I hear it mostly
in big groups but even though I currently run mostly modern gear, I
have to switch a couple of things and prefer longer transmissions
13 matches
Mail list logo
