Luc...
A quick google search leads to this page that even has a contact phone
number...there is entirely too much information for me to digest however it
looks like a component in the portable personal HUGHESnet satellite
system...
Hi Norman:
I used KLM with a polarity switch many years ago.
The polarity switch seemed unreliable and lossy, and I often forgot to change
polarity on Leo’s.
When I replaced my KLM with M2, I decided not to bother with switching polarity
and just run RHCP.
The benefits:
No switch losses,
On 28 May 2009 at 8:53, Roger Kolakowski wrote:
Luc...
A quick google search leads to this page that even has a contact phone
number...there is entirely too much information for me to digest however it
looks like a component in the portable personal HUGHESnet satellite
system...
Hi!
On Saturday, 30 May 2009, I will have an AMSAT table at the hamfest
in Prescott, Arizona. This hamfest is a joint venture between the
Yavapai Amateur Radio Club and Verde Valley Amateur Radio Association,
and will be held at the Granite Mountain Middle School in Prescott
(grid DM34sn). The
I'm not so sure that Joe is using too much power. I have a feeling
that he may have a problem with his radio. I have discussed this with
him several times, to no avail. As such, I usually stay away from AO-7.
I won't apologize, because I frankly think it should be the other way
around,
On 28 May 2009 at 12:26, n1...@burlingtontelecom.net wrote:
Hi Luc,
What are you exactly trying to do? Are you trying to convert this into a 10
GHz transverter for use terrestrially on 10.368 GHz? Or are you
looking at converting to a 'receive only' system on 10.450 GHz (P3E)
From
Hello David,
For what seems like an eternity GO-32 has been sending a telemetry
packet at 9600 baud one per minute.So, NO, the BBS isn't open (and
hasn't been for a long time).
You can decode the telemetry GO-32 frames thanks to Mike DK3WN!
Actually, he has decoders for just about every
Hi Luc,
The PES hasn't been around for a long time, almost 20 years. I don't have
manuals for this anymore and memory fades but the recive range is probably
11.7 to 12.2 Ghz and the transmit range is probably 14.0 to 14.5 Mhz. I
think the receive IF range is the standard 950-1450 Mhz range but
I believe the waveguide is WR-75 which is rated for 10-15 GHz, but I also
believe the system will not move down to the 3cm amateur radio band without
serious modifications.
John WA4WDL
--
From: Luc Leblanc luclebla...@videotron.ca
Sent:
Drew and Gould,
Thanks for getting A0-51 back up on the last pass. (around 0010utc)
Not sure who pulled the trigger, but I know both of you keep the bird
working for our ongoing communications.
Thanks again for the fast service,
Rick - WA4NVM
___
Amen to that!
Thanks guys.
Tim - N3TL
-- Original message from Rick - WA4NVM wa4...@comcast.net:
--
Drew and Gould,
Thanks for getting A0-51 back up on the last pass. (around 0010utc)
Not sure who pulled the trigger, but I know both of you keep the bird
Gould does 99% of the commanding...I'm more the arranger and scheduler and
planner. He deserves ALL the credit!
73, Drew KO4MA
- Original Message -
From: Rick - WA4NVM wa4...@comcast.net
To: AMSAT BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:39 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Thanks to
For vhf/uhf satellite use I'm seriously thinking about selling off my FT-847
for money toward a IC-910. Could some of you on this list comment on how
these 2 radios compare for satellite (and if you know vhf/uhf weak signal)
work? why one radio over the other? What are your thoughts and
13 matches
Mail list logo
