Bwahahaha
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:52 PM, JoAnne Maenpaa k9...@comcast.net wrote:
... puppeteer drive in my star ship in a few years
Unfortunately, the Inter-Galactic Traffic in Arms Regulations will
prevent us from talking about this! ;-)
--
73 de JoAnne K9JKM
k9...@amsat.org
It doesn't violate any laws of physics if you are expending power from
photovoltaics to propel your spacecraft.
For example, you could push against the Earth's magnetic field to get a
satellite into a higher orbit.
This article seems to confirm this model, although they don't know what
they
It's either fodder for the conspiracy theorists or it'll win a Noble prize.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Mike Lemons mo...@mindspring.com wrote:
It doesn't violate any laws of physics if you are expending power from
photovoltaics to propel your spacecraft.
For example, you could push
...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Robert McGwier
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 5:55 PM
To: amsat bb
Subject: [amsat-bb] NO EJECTION MASS Propulsion
I hope they aren't wrong because they clearly don't understand how it
works!!!
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R
: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf
Of Robert McGwier
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 5:55 PM
To: amsat bb
Subject: [amsat-bb] NO EJECTION MASS Propulsion
I hope they aren't wrong because they clearly don't understand how it
works!!!
http://ntrs.nasa.gov
,
Alan
WA4SCA
-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Robert McGwier
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 5:55 PM
To: amsat bb
Subject: [amsat-bb] NO EJECTION MASS Propulsion
I hope they aren't wrong because they clearly don't
Hi, Marty!!
Suggest sticking to the Annals of Improbable Research (AIR). See:
http://www.improbable.com. It’s all real, vetted, and celebrated by awarding
of the IgNobel prizes every year. This year will be the 24th First Annual
IgNobel Prize Ceremony and Lectures, See your AIRheads in
I hope they aren't wrong because they clearly don't understand how it
works!!!
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052
Bob
N4HY
--
Bob McGwier
Co-Owner and Technical Director, Federated Wireless, LLC
Professor Virginia Tech
Senior Member IEEE, Facebook: N4HYBob, ARS: N4HY
Faculty
@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] NO EJECTION MASS Propulsion
I hope they aren't wrong because they clearly don't understand how it
works!!!
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052
Bob
N4HY
--
Bob McGwier
Co-Owner and Technical Director, Federated Wireless, LLC
Professor Virginia Tech
Senior
How can you tell? They've got enough 10-gallon words in the Abstract to
propel mountains...
Still, I've been wondering if we'll ever find a space propulsion
mechanism that doesn't involve throwing parts of the spacecraft overboard.
Greg KO6TH
Robert McGwier wrote:
I hope they aren't
At 03:54 PM 8/4/2014, Robert McGwier wrote:
I hope they aren't wrong because they clearly don't understand how it
works!!! http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052
The result is surely wrong.
When measuring MICROnewtons, from a device that's going to be getting
very hot (because the
11 matches
Mail list logo