I don't see why Hams couldn't be involved in the design of the communications
for the probe...
On Nov 5, 2011, at 11:11 AM, R Oler wrote:
>
> I wrote: (and the time delay makes it well a unique form of
> transportation)..transportation should obviously be "communication".
>
> the reality
- Original Message -
From: "R Oler"
To:
Cc: "Amsat BB"
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 6:11 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ESA lunar probe
>
> I wrote: (and the time delay makes it well a unique form of
> transportation)..transportation should obviously
At 09:11 AM 11/5/2011, R Oler wrote:
I wrote: (and the time delay makes it well a unique form of
transportation)..transportation should obviously be "communication".
the reality of a lunar transponder (or even a packet system) would
be that it would encourage a lot of things that the FM sats
Bob...its been done here a zillion times...it wont be done with an HT and a
small yagi...it will however be possible whereas a "Mars" effort is really not
possible for anyone except "Goldstone class" stations (and the time delay makes
it well a unique form of transportation). A small linear tr
I wrote: (and the time delay makes it well a unique form of
transportation)..transportation should obviously be "communication".
the reality of a lunar transponder (or even a packet system) would be that it
would encourage a lot of things that the FM sats do not...and discourage a lot
of bad
Just for the sake of conversation and thinking. What would the link budget
look like for a transponder on the moon.
Bob W7LRD
- Original Message -
From: "R Oler"
To: "Amsat BB"
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2011 4:10:00 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] ESA lunar probe
http://www.bbc.
