Good Morning, all...
Just adding my 2 cents worth...I was a skeptic as well previously. There
are numerous reasons why it would seem that humans COULDN'T make it to the
moon and back with such crude technology. I grew up hearing the
storiesbut never quite believed.
That was until I read
LeRoy,
I'm not sure how you can have a source other than NASA, other than two hams
who made independant recordings of Apollo transmissions. In 1971 (summer
issue) a QST article talks of Dick Knadle(sp?) KRIW who got some, and another
ham, I believe W4HHK received signals as well.
I'd also bet
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 02:52:08 Edward Cole wrote:
LeRoy,
I'm not sure how you can have a source other than NASA, other than two
hams who made independant recordings of Apollo transmissions. In 1971
(summer issue) a QST article talks of Dick Knadle(sp?) KRIW who got some,
and another
Why does everyone continue to try to talk to this Brain dead person.
it really goes to show how the FCC has dumbed down the tests.
geez
STeve Andre' wrote:
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 02:52:08 Edward Cole wrote:
LeRoy,
I'm not sure how you can have a source other than NASA, other than two
Not so much the FCC as our wonderful public Education system that seems to
have forgotten how to instill critical thinking in their students.
Jim KQ6EA
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, Joe n...@mwt.net wrote:
From: Joe n...@mwt.net
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Evidence of moon landings!
To: STeve Andre
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 15:42 -0700, Dale Hershberger wrote:
I for one wholeheartedly agree. Lets get on with real things,
satellites and radios.
I've got a better idea. Let's start a lunar exploration project. We've
had forty years of advances in materials science. We have all that
But we've yet to develop a satellite that can carry people.
We have problem getting an affordable launch for something the size and weight
of a corn flakes box, I doubt we can
launch something the size of a small car.
Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
I've got a better idea. Let's start a lunar
Interesting how technology advances change our views, too. Who would have
said how hard can it be to go to the moon 40 years ago?!
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 15:42 -0700, Dale Hershberger wrote:
I for one wholeheartedly agree. Lets get on with real things,
satellites and radios.
I've got a
://www.HamOhio.com
Sent on the Now Network� from my Sprint® BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: John P. Toscano tosca...@tc.umn.edu
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:53:26
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Evidence of moon landings!
William Leijenaar wrote:
The news is full again
Explain me this,,For something as big as NASA to be a hoax there would
be 10s of thousands of people in on it for 50+ years. and not one of
them has talked? Thats unbelivable. Take crop circles, which is a fairly
obvious hoax, there was 2 old drunks in england doing them and they
talked about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can we kill this thread please? This is insanely off topic...
Besides everyone knows that NASA is a front by the trilateral commission
to keep us from looking into Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster.
- --
Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA
bbj at
that is not what
I was doing or my intention. Please email me off list. And we can talk more
LeRoy, KD8BXP
http://www.HamOhio.com
--Original Message--
From: Roger Kolakowski
Sender: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Evidence of moon landings!
Sent: Jul
My aplogies, Mr. Kolakowski, to you personally and to everyone on the board. No
real threats were intended. Apparently my sarcasm was not well-taken - at least
not by you.
I remain open to anyone who can explain the reasons why the two issues I raised
are as they are - and ask that such
See
Moon astronauts urge Mars mission
here! http://foxyurl.com/p4w
Rumours that Stephen Spielberg has been signed up to provide the special
effects are currently unsubstantiated but obviously the BBC are already
on board.
:-P
David
KG4ZLB
___
On Monday 20 July 2009 10:27:12 kd8...@aol.com wrote:
It wouldn't be as hard to hoax something like that at all -
And yes - I know what I am going to say will make people think that I got
the idea from a movie. I did not.
But the movie Capricorn One (Which was made late 70s early 80s I
on ham
radio...now it includes HEO vs LEO and Lunar landing realities...
Roger
WA1KAT
- Original Message -
From: n...@bellsouth.net
To: Roger Kolakowski ; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Evidence of moon landings!
My
AMEN.
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cowan yet.another.sq...@gmail.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:17 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Evidence of moon landings!
Which is more reasonable:
1. That a 40 year grand conspiracy involving literally thousands of people
Jim Leder wrote:
AMEN.
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cowan yet.another.sq...@gmail.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:17 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Evidence of moon landings!
Which is more reasonable:
1. That a 40 year grand conspiracy involving
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 01:45:59PM -0400, David - KG4ZLB wrote:
..but there again, the BBC could also be in on this supposed
hoax.yawn!
See for yourself http://foxyurl.com/oUk.
Wow! impressive photoshopping. ;-)
(You'll never convince the hard core moon landing deniers with actual
:14 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Evidence of moon landings!
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 01:45:59PM -0400, David - KG4ZLB wrote:
..but there again, the BBC could also be in on this supposed
hoax.yawn!
See for yourself http://foxyurl.com/oUk.
Wow! impressive photoshopping. ;-)
(You'll
PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Evidence of moon landings!
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 01:45:59PM -0400, David - KG4ZLB wrote:
..but there again, the BBC could also be in on this supposed
hoax.yawn!
See for yourself http://foxyurl.com/oUk.
Wow! impressive photoshopping. ;-)
(You'll
I really wanted to have an open mind about this but Just as I had figured - the
picture was too grainy to make out any details, the picture was taken by a US
rocket which means Nasa - and it happend to be at the same time the real
landing took place. Come on now, if Nasa is feeding you the
22 matches
Mail list logo
