yeah, no problem, as long as we keep my objective : get it released before
christmas!
the important thing now is the stability (things we're fixing now at the
last minute) and the other things that goes around the release (web site,
news).. the releases are easy to make, I mean, everyone can
well, I just happened to make the deb file because I use debian and 'make
deb' was simple enough, and the bitrock installers is because I'm the one
with the license file... and autopackage, because I'm the one contacting
Taj Morton, the auto-package maintainer and he's not able to make amsn
LOL!A lot of responsabilities :PLe 05-12-10 à 02:23, Youness Alaoui a écrit :I will also wait for these things to finish, while I'm making sure the packages I'm now responsible of (bitrock installer for windows + linux + autopackage + debian) work correctly...
Yeah, I think it should be 'now', I still would want to wait until either
MONDAY, or WEDNESDAY! just to make sure everything is there and I've put
everything that I had in my followup and make sure that the language
maintainers flushed everything that was queued for the language files...
I wi
I'll do it but it will probably be slower than last time to do it (as I said, exam time is begining :P) As I said in my last message, I won't disagree . That's that we have to do it but that's necessary!Le 05-12-09 à 21:49, Youness Alaoui a écrit :Thank you Phil! Jerome, I'm asking because I may b
Thank you Phil!
Jerome, I'm asking because I may be project manager, but you also have
your word to say (being the only other active admin at the moment), that's
why I'm asking, decisions have to be made in groups...
I will do it, once I'm sure we forgot nothing, but can you please make a
ne
I know you didn't said it :P But I just want to make my point, if you
want to tag 0.95-1 (something witch I won't disagree), we have to do
it now (at least after fixing the bug with the reflector, if you
wanted to <<>> it) and not in one week. At least I supose it
should be faster to recrea
haha, I never said "Do it, you, the one who is releasing", it's just "this
has to be done", when we read it, we'll write to the language managers and
tell them "don't forget, we need this to be done before ..."
KKRT
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:27:12 -0500, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
This patch changes a sentence in the config window. Could native
english speakers check my english ?
And it changes the behaviour of a button in the Preview window.
The plugininfo.xml should be updated, but i don't know how to deal
with that (or i don't want to do it :p)
Greets
Ps : I'm still
Should be fixed in CVS
Phil
Le Vendredi 9 Décembre 2005 18:56, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer a écrit :
> Stop waiting and do it, still the Mac release is good because there's
> no bug inside but if you have a major bugs in linux, then tag a
> 0-95-1 and re-ask people to redo the packages. If you think you d
Stop waiting and do it, still the Mac release is good because there's no bug inside but if you have a major bugs in linux, then tag a 0-95-1 and re-ask people to redo the packages. If you think you don't have choice then .. that's it!Le 05-12-09 à 08:11, Youness Alaoui a écrit :Note to Jerome too :
Just checked it. It's working fine :)
On 12/9/05, Thomas Martinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I built my package from this:
> http://kakaroto.homelinux.net/amsn/amsn-0.95-src.tar.gz
> Just so you know.
>
> Lz wrote:
>
> >AFAIK, no! i did a checkout the day of the 0.95 release and it was
> >right
Yeah but we need the lang managers to do it, you can't really do it
unless you: already subscribed to amsn-lang-commit list, you know
what are the lang files that are not commited, verify the encoding,
verify other stuff..That's why a normal developer can't do it unless
he really knows what
I built my package from this:
http://kakaroto.homelinux.net/amsn/amsn-0.95-src.tar.gz
Just so you know.
Lz wrote:
AFAIK, no! i did a checkout the day of the 0.95 release and it was
right, i noticed half an hour ago that it was not right :P
On 12/9/05, Thomas Martinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
AFAIK, no! i did a checkout the day of the 0.95 release and it was
right, i noticed half an hour ago that it was not right :P
On 12/9/05, Thomas Martinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So packages has to be rebuilt?
>
> Alvaro J. Iradier wrote:
>
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
So packages has to be rebuilt?
Alvaro J. Iradier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I don't know who last sent langes file. The encoding was wrong, it
was encoded in utf-8 but previous versions were iso8859-1. I've fixed
it, converting to iso8859-1. Please be careful.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I don't know who last sent langes file. The encoding was wrong, it
was encoded in utf-8 but previous versions were iso8859-1. I've fixed
it, converting to iso8859-1. Please be careful.
I hope the right version is included in 0.95!
Greets.
- --
ok, cool,
thanks again... I'll be waiting for feedback (from slack users)...
I'm currntly installing slackware with qemu (downloading the image from
oszoo actually) I'll try all that tonight.
KKRT
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 04:03:42 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's no problem.
I can handle
Hi there,
Thank you for the feedback, you indeed found the first 0.95 bug :D
yes, I do understand you never mentioned the word "bug", but the "tk
error" is a bug, and as you can see, it doesn't let you do what you want,
so it's bug...also, the "error submission screen" that you talked about is
That's no problem.
I can handle a little downloading :P
Yeah, docs should always be in /usr/doc. :)
> Thank you, I'll put it up probably during the week-end with all other
> packages...
> you should have sent it to me directly, now that you published it on the
> amsn-devel mailing list, I suppose
20 matches
Mail list logo
