Op donderdag 25 mei 2006 17:08, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> On Thu, 25 May 2006 06:55:10 -0400, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I looked at this, but have not looked at Karel's code, so do not know
> > all of
> > the differences. But what I see here, is that there is no r
Added :
- amsn-remote server is created with [socket -server localhost] so we can
never connect to amsn remotely unless we ssh first to our machine (server
is on the loopback device), problem with windows too.. socket should
listen to all ips.
COMPLETE TODO LIST FOR 0.96
- Make sure all
On Thu, 25 May 2006 13:50:28 -0400, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Removed:
- The 'X' in the titlebar should NOT quit without a confirmation
message. We should have a confirmation dialog that allows minimizing to
tray
with a "don't ask again" option.
- Check if the 'View Profile' i
On Thu, 25 May 2006 15:06:23 -0400, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Op donderdag 25 mei 2006 17:08, schreef Youness Alaoui:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 06:55:10 -0400, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[CUT]
and have all those events get directed to the same function ? it's
easier
this
Removed:
- The 'X' in the titlebar should NOT quit without a confirmation
message. We should have a confirmation dialog that allows minimizing to tray
with a "don't ask again" option.
- Check if the 'View Profile' is working correctly, it seems to be
broken. * Tried it several times, no problems
Removed :
- Custom states not saved on disconnect/reconnect
COMPLETE TODO LIST FOR 0.96
- maybe apply holy_wood patch for saving DPs in a per_email directories
in
the cache.
- finish proxy support
- Make amsn 0.96 use TLS 1.5
- Check if the 'View Profile' is working correctly, it seems to be
brok
no now I answered your email :p and.. euhh.. sorry for my huge mails.. I'm
a work, and not so motivated so understand me :P
but yes, I do thnk we agree on most stuff, I was sure you'd like my design
:P but comment on what I wrote answering your own email, maybe we're not
on the same road afte
On Thu, 25 May 2006 06:55:10 -0400, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I looked at this, but have not looked at Karel's code, so do not know
all of
the differences. But what I see here, is that there is no real separation
between the gui part and the keeping of the data to displa
Wow, you answered most of my e-mail too :-)
And it seems we agree on many things!
Harry
Op donderdag 25 mei 2006 16:22, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> Ok, your whole message is one block, so I'll answer it directly :
> I said I didn't finish, right ? :P that's why I didn't want to commit... I
> agree
Ok, your whole message is one block, so I'll answer it directly :
I said I didn't finish, right ? :P that's why I didn't want to commit... I
agree with you, the contact object should be separate from clgui.tcl but
no, it's not a amsncore.tcl thing, I think it should go in contact.tcl.
I'm th
Hi,
I looked at this, but have not looked at Karel's code, so do not know all of
the differences. But what I see here, is that there is no real separation
between the gui part and the keeping of the data to display. But it is very
well separated from the protocol code!
Okay about the data kee
Yeah, me too. It was a small error I made :).
Op wo, 24-05-2006 te 19:18 -0400, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> wrong ML again :p
> I would vote for close without confirmation...
>
> --- Forwarded message ---
> From: "Harry Vennik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Am
I took a quick look now and Im already going to answer. Why is the
contact type in clgui.tcl ? it shouldn't depend in it. the contact
type should bein amsncore.tcl I guess and allow to be a contact of
whatever kind. So in the future it could be a Jabber contact, a MSN
non-IM contact (as MSN 8
13 matches
Mail list logo
