Hi,
finally I am approved as a Fedora Extras contributor. The tls package is
approved also, and the amsn package is almost that far. I have learned a
lot in the process especially why distros like Fedora (redhat) have such
a high patch count and especially why this is certainly not always a bad
th
ok, how about ubuntu (iirc) the package didn't work because 'tcltls'
didn't exist in their repos... and some people use the autopackage or
bitrock...
but yes, about SELinux, indeed, the dependancy should take care of that by
itself, but what if the FC user installed amsn by compiling from sou
thank you for taking care of that and not forgetting it :)
On Fri, 26 May 2006 21:26:49 -0400, Lee Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/24/06, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> cool, what are we waiting for? ;)
>>
>
> Uploaded. You'll see it on the main page.
>
> ~Lee
>
>> On Wed,
On 5/24/06, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cool, what are we waiting for? ;)
>
Uploaded. You'll see it on the main page.
~Lee
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:37:29 -0400, Tom Hennigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for: http://www.softpedia.com/awards/softpedia_games_award1_bs.gif
Op donderdag 25 mei 2006 22:01, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> On Thu, 25 May 2006 15:06:23 -0400, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > Op donderdag 25 mei 2006 17:08, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> >> On Thu, 25 May 2006 06:55:10 -0400, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [CUT]
>
> >> and have a
Hi,
I think we shouldn't provide packages for FC on the website
We will provide them trough the extras repository... With it, yum will
download all dependencies... So if we need a new version of libc it will
download it automatically
Phil
P.S. Sorry to not being present since the beginnin
The way I see it:
tls was as a seperate download because amsn was tcl/tk, so doing it this
way required no compiling.. Now we have parts in c, so we have to
compile anyway. What is the use of not including it?
Sander
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 16:24 -0400, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> Well, tls has no prob
Well, tls has no problems with SELInux, right ?
problem is in TkCximage.. so how about dynamic builds for the FC distros,
since those distros are the ones using SELinux..
also have in the list of packages "your package didn't work, download this
and read the INSTALL file"
We should also change
Good idea,
btw, conclusion about SELinux and tls 1.5 ? We can:
a) let SELinux users install Sander's RPM and offer the static build instead
b) have two options: Linux (static build) and Linux (dynamic build) or
something similar
or... any better ideas?
PS: am I slowly getting active again? :)
On Fri, 26 May 2006 12:53:37 -0400, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/25/06, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> lol @ your last sentence, nice though :)
>> You know how I feel about that, so you can count me in, as soon as I get
>> some time, I'll be doing some stuff.. right now I'm rewr
Hi all,
I've been sending this mail for a while, it seems that yesterday SF
mailing list service was down, but this time, mails were bouncing bac, not
being delayed in the server, so if you sent a mail yesterday to the
mailing list and you didn't receive it yet, I suggest you resend your
ma
Hi there,
as you probably know, the tls autodownloader isn't working for some time
now because the URL for the download is to a mirror which is not working
anymore...
So.. if we change the mirror, we might get the same problem some other
time, so how about we do this instead
http://amsn.sf.net/down
ignore if it ever reaches you...
--
KaKaRoTo
___
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
On 5/25/06, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lol @ your last sentence, nice though :)
> You know how I feel about that, so you can count me in, as soon as I get
> some time, I'll be doing some stuff.. right now I'm rewriting part of the
> new CL that Karel wrote, making it even more modu
14 matches
Mail list logo
