Added :
- contact list's contacts are mixed up when using default profile :
http://amsn.sourceforge.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=6615#6615
COMPLETE TODO LIST FOR 0.96
- We can't send files to msn8 users.
- cancel signin gets activated as soon as we press Log in, not when we
get the answer from ne
Heya,Would someone commit these files for me?? They are to support the new Intel Macs. The libraries in the archive are sndplay, and tclCarbonHICommand and tclCarbonNotification. sndplay is just one binary file, so that would just replace the previous one (in utils/macosx) and the other two are ext
I spoke to Alvaro on PM, but he had to run, so I'm writing here instead of him:
> 1) now we have to update the version in the amsn file.. what should it
> become? More generally, what will this release be?
> 0.96rc1 followed by rc2, then rc..., then 0.96
> or 0.96 followed by 0.96.1, etc
> i would
Hi,
I spoke to Youness and he said it isn't good
We should use its idea about an internal version...
Why ?
Because like it is now, users with 0.96rc1 will have the autoupdater which
will say that they must upgrade to 0.95...
Phil
Le Friday 16 June 2006 01:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Rev
Yes, you're right.. but the translations could come in with the 0.96
release, it's not that needed for the RC1.. but we'll have to assume we
won't add any new keys in between, which should be the case since we'll
only fix bugs between RCs, not add new stuff...
KKRT
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:50:
5) Send a mail to language translators so that they'll update the
languages files.
For 0.95, a mail was sent.
Or do we release the 0.96 branch as it is right now, because languages
are easily updated, so it's that much useful.
--
Boris FAURE (aka billiob)
mail, msn : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No trees we
On 6/15/06, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cool! :)
> btw, you're not agreeing with me, you're agreeing with SVN philosophy and
> with O'Reilly's book :D
> about your idea you PMed me, releasing a 0.95.90 version as the RC...
> yeah... might work... but would be too confusing for the u
cool! :)
btw, you're not agreeing with me, you're agreeing with SVN philosophy and
with O'Reilly's book :D
about your idea you PMed me, releasing a 0.95.90 version as the RC...
yeah... might work... but would be too confusing for the users... I
suggest to keep it 0.96RC1 but maybe have a
set ::
/me ducks
sorry, i was wrong, brains were overworked or something. We should do
the tag yes. Also I agree with the rest of your email about everybody
working in trunk and big changes go in branches, so not everybody has to
commit his changes twice..
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 10:37 -0400, Youness Alaou
can everyone PLEASE read the svn book... especially the chapter on the
branching...
I've just read part of it, but it's so easy to read, really well written,
it's nice and easy to understand. It also allows us to learn more.. like
the 'svn merge', or the 'svn blame' commands...
anyways...
p.
Thanks :d
Now I am less silly ;)
Phil
Le Thursday 15 June 2006 17:17, Jonne Zutt a écrit :
> Technically, they are the same.
> It is possible, though not normal, to commit to a tag.
>
>
> isn't this tag-creation procedure the same procedure we used to create a
> branch? Yes, in fact, it is. In Su
Technically, they are the same.
It is possible, though not normal, to commit to a tag.
isn't this tag-creation procedure the same procedure we used to create a
branch? Yes, in fact, it is. In Subversion, there's no difference
between a tag and a branch. Both are just ordinary directories that are
Thanks :)On 15 Jun 2006, at 12:21, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote:Sorry,I thought the bug were here for Mac and Windows and I realized that it isn't so I fixed it now..PhilLe Thursday 15 June 2006 13:02, Tom Hennigan a écrit : This won't work on osx (just tested it quickly). Maybe a if ![OnMac]{ }
Why Sander said that branches and tags are the same ?
If they were the same why would be there a directory branches and a directory
tags ?
Phil
Le Thursday 15 June 2006 16:43, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:04:29 -0400, Arieh Schneier
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 1) now
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:04:29 -0400, Arieh Schneier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1) now we have to update the version in the amsn file.. what should it
>> become? More generally, what will this release be?
>> 0.96rc1 followed by rc2, then rc..., then 0.96
>> or 0.96 followed by 0.96.1, etc
>> i
what is wrong with you ? why have a 'poll' on wether we should create a
tag or not
First, we MUST create a tag, it's 100% normal, it's the best way to keep
track of what we are doing.. imagine in 1 year or 2, we'd have made so
many changes to SVN, so many new branches, so many backports o
Shouldn't we make a tag of branches/0_96 now (called tags/0_96_1) ?
I think so, because if we commit to 0_96 after the release, we cannot
know what exactly was 0.96.1 in the repository anymore.
And I think that is what Sander meant.
And, iirc, it doesn't consume much repository space, as it is sto
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 23:04 +1000, Arieh Schneier wrote:
> > 1) now we have to update the version in the amsn file.. what should it
> > become? More generally, what will this release be?
> > 0.96rc1 followed by rc2, then rc..., then 0.96
> > or 0.96 followed by 0.96.1, etc
> > i would say the secon
> 1) now we have to update the version in the amsn file.. what should it
> become? More generally, what will this release be?
> 0.96rc1 followed by rc2, then rc..., then 0.96
> or 0.96 followed by 0.96.1, etc
> i would say the second, because if we don't have critical bugs, ...
I agree, I think th
So.. we are ready for a release.. great :)
1) now we have to update the version in the amsn file.. what should it
become? More generally, what will this release be?
0.96rc1 followed by rc2, then rc..., then 0.96
or 0.96 followed by 0.96.1, etc
i would say the second, because if we don't have criti
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 13:38 -0400, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> we can now cancel because he added a button in the CL, but the 'log out'
> from the menu is still greyed out until we get the answer from nexus...
but is this a problem?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
Sorry,
I thought the bug were here for Mac and Windows and I realized that it isn't
so I fixed it now..
Phil
Le Thursday 15 June 2006 13:02, Tom Hennigan a écrit :
> This won't work on osx (just tested it quickly). Maybe a if ![OnMac]
> { } or something. I don't have time to write/test any ideas
This won't work on osx (just tested it quickly). Maybe a if ![OnMac] { } or something. I don't have time to write/test any ideas as I'm off to a maths exam like now!TomOn 15 Jun 2006, at 11:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Revision: 6861Author: lephilousopheDate: 2006-06-15 03:51:18 -0700 (Thu, 15
23 matches
Mail list logo
