[Amsn-devel] [PATCHES] deb generation cleaning and random stuff

2006-09-20 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
* dh_client -k should not be used for deb generation since we are building a single target. * .svn directories are being included due to an unchaged rule in Makefile.in from old CVS times, so we fix this (thanks lintian!). * Append SVN release number to deb builds if it is not stable with

Re: [Amsn-devel] [PATCHES] deb generation cleaning and random stuff

2006-09-20 Thread Álvaro J. Iradier
Thanks! Checking, applying and commiting :) Greets. On 9/20/06, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * dh_client -k should not be used for deb generation since we are building a single target. * .svn directories are being included due to an unchaged rule in Makefile.in from old CVS

Re: [Amsn-devel] [PATCHES] deb generation cleaning and random stuff

2006-09-20 Thread Youness Alaoui
Well done! I like the 'which svnversion /dev/null svnversion' ... one thing though.. you changed the version to 0.96rc1 and Alvaro commited to trunk/ which should be 0.97b and couldn't we use a grep thingy to get the version number from the amsn file ? grep set version amsn/amsn | cut whatever

Re: [Amsn-devel] [PATCHES] deb generation cleaning and random stuff

2006-09-20 Thread Álvaro J. Iradier
Yes I agree, I didn't notice. Also, these patches should be merged into 0_96 branch. Greets. On 9/20/06, Youness Alaoui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well done! I like the 'which svnversion /dev/null svnversion' ... one thing though.. you changed the version to 0.96rc1 and Alvaro commited to

Re: [Amsn-devel] [PATCHES] deb generation cleaning and random stuff

2006-09-20 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
I don't know how branches are working in amsn, but apart from the number version things, all others should go into trunk as well IMHO...On 9/20/06, Álvaro J. Iradier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Yes I agree, I didn't notice. Also, these patches should be merged into 0_96 branch.Greets.On 9/20/06,