HeyLipo is easy, the syntax is "lipo -create universal.dylib 10-3-9ppc.dylib -output newfile.dylib". I'll mail you later on when I've built them.- TomOn 25 Jun 2006, at 18:11, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer wrote:Yeah try to compile it for 10.3.9 PPC and let's see if we can lipo everything togetherLe 25 juin
Yeah try to compile it for 10.3.9 PPC and let's see if we can lipo everything togetherLe 25 juin 2006 à 13:11, Tom Hennigan a écrit :Heya,I didn't realize you could have 3 architectures in one binary!! That makes things easier!! If you want me to build the 10.3.9 versions, I can do that later on. I
Heya,I didn't realize you could have 3 architectures in one binary!! That makes things easier!! If you want me to build the 10.3.9 versions, I can do that later on. I'm on holiday atm, so I've got some time on my hands :-)- TomOn 25 Jun 2006, at 17:20, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer wrote:Seems like an excell
Seems like an excellent idea Tom.But are you totally sure it's impossible to have everything together? We can lipo everything together right?Check the TCL-TK Mailling list archives, here's a message===Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer wrote:To add to the problem, if I convert everything to universal,
Hey,We can't have an "all in one binary" as the wish shell needs to be universal also, and is therefore built against the 10.4u SDK, and won't work on 10.3.9 at all. Building Tcl/Tk for 10.3.9 isn't a problem. Building aMSN for 10.3.9 isn't a problem. So we can easily put out milestone releases for
Le 25 juin 2006 à 01:39, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 00:54:44 -0400, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, the thing is when you build something in Universal Binary, it
>> won't work in 10.3.9. Just 10.4
>> So if we want to keep compatibility with 10.3.9,
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 00:54:44 -0400, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, the thing is when you build something in Universal Binary, it
> won't work in 10.3.9. Just 10.4
> So if we want to keep compatibility with 10.3.9, we have to keep
> the .dylib compiled in PPC only. And YES
Yeah, the thing is when you build something in Universal Binary, it
won't work in 10.3.9. Just 10.4
So if we want to keep compatibility with 10.3.9, we have to keep
the .dylib compiled in PPC only. And YES I absolutely want to keep
compatibility with 10.3.9
The thing is
1. aMSN with many .dy
