Indeed, i just tested with my webcam (i'am using pwc drivers from saillard.org) and the bug was introduced in revision 6511.On 5/29/06,
Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know the bug was there for quite some time before I officially entered theteam, so I think it is very likely that the bu
I know the bug was there for quite some time before I officially entered the
team, so I think it is very likely that the bug was introduced either in rev.
6511 or 6513. (Both from date April 29th, 2006 and with a change in
capture.c).
Harry
Op maandag 29 mei 2006 14:11, schreef Vivia Nikolaido
Follow GrdScarabe's instructions to get older SVNs and try to see when
the bug appeared this might help us understand where it comes
from. :)
On 5/28/06, Cristian Peraferrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well not so fast... I was using the "stable" 10.0.12 pwc driver for a several
> time, and I
Well not so fast... I was using the "stable" 10.0.12 pwc driver for a several
time, and I never experimented that issue. Today I've tested it with the
(old) 10.0.12 again (nowadays I use the most recent snapshot), and the issue
now appears!, with the actual aMSN. So I think it's not a pwc driver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Youness Alaoui wrote:
> use :
> svn update --revision revision_number
> I don't know how you can get the revision number depending on the date,
> but try a few revisions back until you get the commit that broke this...
svn update --revision {2006-05
use :
svn update --revision revision_number
I don't know how you can get the revision number depending on the date,
but try a few revisions back until you get the commit that broke this...
KaKaRoTo
On Sun, 28 May 2006 18:49:04 -0400, Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm using pwc and i confirm
Mailing list for developers and everyone helping AMSN
>
>To: "Mailing list for developers and everyone helping AMSN"
>
>Subject: Re: [Amsn-devel] webcam is not released after using it
>Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 00:49:04 +0200
>
>i'm using pwc and i confirm that there is a
i'm using pwc and i confirm that there is a problem but it only appeared recently... the bug was not present before (i would say like 2 to 3 weeks ago). If you guys tells me how to use previous versions of amsn with svn (is that even possible?), i could tell you exactly when this bug arrived in ams
in the forums, many people reported the issue, but I don't know if they
were all using pwc...
if the change is indeed caused by the change of getimage to nextframe
call, then it might be because there was an mmap or a buffer allocated
that was never freed...
we should check the return value o
Always works perfectly with ov511, tested thousands of times on my
side. Another person with spca5xx also confirmed that webcam is
released correctly.
So let's just assume it's a pwc bug? :)
On 5/28/06, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About 'webcam not released': I can confirm this is t
About 'webcam not released': I can confirm this is true, and have already
searched through the code for the reason why this happens. It *might* be
related to the change from getimage() to nextframe(), but I am not at all
sure. Because all necessary calls seem to be done correctly, which is
appr
11 matches
Mail list logo
