[Amsn-devel] svn rev 8930 BUG

2007-07-30 Thread Youness Alaoui
yeah, it's a BUG!! Baazen... your latest changes made all chat windows close on logout... WHY? I don't think it's a good idea, and it's also a change in behavior which should have been discussed on the mailing list, and I didn't get any email.. unless SF screwed up and I don't get any more

Re: [Amsn-devel] svn rev 8930 BUG

2007-07-30 Thread Harry Vennik
Youness, I think there is no reason to yell that much. There were a few e-mails about this, although this exact behavior was not agreed upon. But it might be just a wrong implementation of what was discussed. So, still a BUG, but no need for saying there hasn't been any discussion. (FYI:

Re: [Amsn-devel] svn rev 8930 BUG

2007-07-30 Thread Youness Alaoui
Hi Harry, First, I wasn't yelling, I don't think I yelled and if I did, I'm sorry, it wasn't my intention, all I said was that features like that should be discussed, and that I just lost all my CWs and I was :( about the discussion, lol, I should really see a doctor, I even answered on that

Re: [Amsn-devel] [Amsn-commits] SF.net SVN: amsn: [8929] trunk/amsn

2007-07-30 Thread Harry Vennik
Hi, I also tend to regard the staying open of all windows (and even being able to continue chatting!) to be a feature, which is an advantage of aMSN compared to WLM. But I'd like to know why people call it a vulnerability... Is it somewhere on the forums? If there is a good reason for that

Re: [Amsn-devel] [Amsn-commits] SF.net SVN: amsn: [8929] trunk/amsn

2007-07-30 Thread Youness Alaoui
yeah, people (who?) see this as a vulnerability because you might logout, leave the pc, and someone could come and read your messages, or continue chatting in your place if the SB didn't close (after less than 1 minute of last activity) which is just absurd... *maybe* we could have it close

Re: [Amsn-devel] [Amsn-commits] SF.net SVN: amsn: [8929] trunk/amsn

2007-07-30 Thread Harry Vennik
Indeed it is not much of an effort to close the windows one by one (most of the time there won't be many anyway). And I agree asking continually is annoying. Now a 'remember my choice' thing is provided to avoid that (rev. 8933), but I don't think that really makes sense. If there is an