A waste of CPU... there's no reason to do something like that, we don't need to
complicate the code and
do useless stuff if it's not needed.. the resize DP is not a feature you'll use
everyday hoping that
you'll keep the original image, and you usally don't plan on resizing the DP
every 5 minu
Btw, it seems I don't have that problem...
Thanks, bye
2007/9/7, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> you do that then you restart amsn and you lost what you resized, so it has
> to be saved on disk after
> resize...
>
-
Th
you do that then you restart amsn and you lost what you resized, so it has to
be saved on disk after
resize...
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:35:31PM +, square87 wrote:
> 2007/9/6, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'll look at this later, when I get time. Thanks for sending t
Why not store only the original and, if desired, resize when loading it?
Op 7-sep-2007, om 9:25 heeft Youness Alaoui het volgende geschreven:
> that means double disk space and double code complexity, while
> 'original' getting downloaded is very
> simple code and not that problematic since it'
that means double disk space and double code complexity, while 'original'
getting downloaded is very
simple code and not that problematic since it's P2P and it's pretty fast..
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:49:59PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 06/09/07, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro