[Amsn-devel] Notification window.

2008-01-12 Thread square87
Hi all :) I just want to say that i'll start to work on notification window to allow smileys and colored text in it. Just i did with topCW. If you are not agree or whatever: say it :P I'll update this post. Bye. Square87 -

Re: [Amsn-devel] [Amsn-commits] SF.net SVN: amsn: [9360] trunk/amsn/utils/base64/base64.tcl

2008-01-12 Thread Sander Hoentjen
Hi Billiob, Did you report this also to the tcllib maintainers? If not, anyone with a newer tcllib installation (and all Fedora users) will still have the bug. Sander On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 16:00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Revision: 9360

[Amsn-devel] Problem with tcllib from ubuntu repos

2008-01-12 Thread Karel Demeyer
Hi, when having installed tlcllib from the ubuntu 7.10 repos, I get this error on login (trying to login): 11:53:12 - 11:53:12 GOT TCL/TK ERROR : {{The keyset handle mescapec is invalid!}} Stack: The keyset handle quot;mescapecquot; is invalid!

Re: [Amsn-devel] [Amsn-commits] SF.net SVN: amsn: [9360] trunk/amsn/utils/base64/base64.tcl

2008-01-12 Thread Boris Faure (aka billiob)
On Jan 12, 2008 10:33 AM, Sander Hoentjen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Billiob, Did you report this also to the tcllib maintainers? If not, anyone with a newer tcllib installation (and all Fedora users) will still have the bug. Sander Done with that bug report :

Re: [Amsn-devel] [Amsn-commits] SF.net SVN: amsn: [9360] trunk/amsn/utils/base64/base64.tcl

2008-01-12 Thread Youness Alaoui
In theory, it shouldn't be sent upstream, since it's normal that if you have an invalid string, it should crash and tell you about it. Anyways, I fixed it in my yesterday's last commit (r936x something) i remove the leading '=' that M$ sends us sometimes in the b64 string, this way we don't

Re: [Amsn-devel] Notification window.

2008-01-12 Thread Youness Alaoui
I don't agree well.. I don't like the idea because we want to have a bugfix release, and I don't want new features in... The MSNP15 was ok because everything was inside an 'if [config::getKey protocol] == 15' so it wouldn't affect anything else. But now, you're already working on it, and

Re: [Amsn-devel] Notification window.

2008-01-12 Thread Tom Hennigan
Why not branch now? Then new features can go to trunk, bug fixes go on the 0.97.1 branch? On 12 Jan 2008, at 20:26, Youness Alaoui wrote: I don't agree well.. I don't like the idea because we want to have a bugfix release, and I don't want new features in... The MSNP15 was ok because

Re: [Amsn-devel] Notification window.

2008-01-12 Thread Youness Alaoui
Can be done, but we can also do it later... basically, why later.. only because the more I wait, the more chance someone else will do this boring task... lol no seriously, the reason is because if we have two branches now, we'll have to commit in both branches, which is

Re: [Amsn-devel] Notification window.

2008-01-12 Thread Philippe Valembois - Phil
The branch is here We only have to merge changes applied to the trunk to it In fact I hope we will do 0.97.1 without any P15 code ! Phil Youness Alaoui a écrit : Can be done, but we can also do it later... basically, why later.. only because the more I wait, the more chance someone else

Re: [Amsn-devel] Notification window.

2008-01-12 Thread Youness Alaoui
and to also separate their commits, in order words don't do one commit containing multiple things like a bugfix and a feature... make them into 2 commits. On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:05:01AM +0100, Harry Vennik wrote: I agee to that. As we have to use the 0_97 branch anyway (and we do), why