On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Youness Alaoui wrote:
at uni, but you don't have access to the CDs to install it on your laptop
or at home for example, no ?
For us here, we just go to somewhere on a M$ website with our univ un/pw,
and we can either download everything we like (apart frmo M$ Office) or
For us, we have everything free at University, legal.
Visual Studio Full Version .net, Windows XP Pro SP2, and almost all
Microsoft products.
Le 28 juin 2006 à 12:08, Philippe Valembois - Phil a écrit :
I think it's a good idea as I use only VC++6 (official version
bought at
reduced
at uni, but you don't have access to the CDs to install it on your laptop
or at home for example, no ?
KKRT
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:10:17 -0400, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For us, we have everything free at University, legal.
Visual Studio Full Version .net, Windows XP
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 13:11 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Modified: trunk/amsn/utils/windows/winutils/winutils.h
===
--- trunk/amsn/utils/windows/winutils/winutils.h 2006-06-27 18:39:50 UTC
(rev 6987)
+++
pleased to meet you, I am big brother, and I am watching you :P
Anyway, isn't it a good idea to keep project files on svn, just as we
have Makefile etc, or is that a stupid thing to say?
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 23:06 +0200, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote:
I said to myself : I hope nobody will ask
Nah, not stupid, I was about to suggest it (which is why it's not stupid
^o) :P)
We already have some project files, but not all.. we have .vcproj and .sln
for tkcximage I think but that's the .NET project files, I prefer the .dsp
and .dsw files, anyways, whatever we add, it should be the
