On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 17:35 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 04:46:59PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Would love to do some brainstorming about how we can share more
> > code/ideas in general; I had some specific comments towards the
> > end.
>
> Thanks for bringing this
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:53 PM Pat Riehecky wrote:
> This does indeed sound interesting.
>
> Anaconda is one of the more complex bits of software I've worked with.
> It does a lot various things with a fair bit of flexibility.
>
> My thoughts after 20 seconds of reflection (aka, not thought throu
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 04:46:59PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Would love to do some brainstorming about how we can share more code/ideas in
> general; I had some specific comments towards the end.
Thanks for bringing this up, Colin. I appreciate the work-together effort in
particular. In the
This does indeed sound interesting.
Anaconda is one of the more complex bits of software I've worked with.
It does a lot various things with a fair bit of flexibility.
My thoughts after 20 seconds of reflection (aka, not thought through at
all):
I wonder if it might make sense to converge
Oh hm, and I even posted about this here earlier and forgot:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2018-April/msg5.html
To be honest though at that time I didn't have a full grasp on Ignition, and
certainly not how the OpenShift installer worked, etc. It became clearer to me
l
Hi, I wanted to link this here:
https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/issues/91
Most importantly starting from
https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/issues/91#issuecomment-422830233
and the most recent ones.
Would love to do some brainstorming about how we can share more code/ideas in
