Thanks!
I'll kick up a patch to change the comment to match the expected behavior.
Pat
On 6/19/19 7:22 AM, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
So about the code and treeinfo. This repository is not loaded because
it is disabled on the netboot image and the code is iterating only
between enabl
Hello,
So about the code and treeinfo. This repository is not loaded because
it is disabled on the netboot image and the code is iterating only
between enabled repositories, which is the correct behavior I would
say.
Yes the comment is wrong, originally it was above the
``self.set_updates_enabled(s
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 13:58 -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> I noticed an unexpected behavior in Fedora 30.
>
>
>
> The net install disk for Workstation ships with the
> 'fedora-cisco-openh264' repo on the media. However, the repo is not
> listed under the 'Installation Source'
I noticed an unexpected behavior in Fedora 30.
The net install disk for Workstation ships with the
'fedora-cisco-openh264' repo on the media. However, the repo is not
listed under the 'Installation Source' spoke.
Should this repo be loaded into the addons list?
I suppose this is a bit of co
