Re: btrfs mkfs options for root filesystem?

2021-02-09 Thread David Lehman
On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 12:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I wanted to use `--csum xxhash` to create the btrfs filesystem on the > system > I just installed. Unfortunately, this proves to be impossible, since > Anaconda requires that / be formatted by Anaconda. It's a small > performance > win

Re: Query about rhinstaller/anaconda#2651

2020-06-25 Thread David Lehman
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 21:29 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > Hey all, > > So I was looking at the Anaconda commits today, and I saw this > change[1] land, which changes how default partitioning is set up. The > change is somewhat confusing to me, because it _seems_ like it makes > it so that we

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

2019-09-09 Thread David Lehman
On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 18:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 13:38 -0400, David Lehman wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 12:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hey folks! > > > > Hi Adam! Thanks for bringing this up again. > >

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

2019-09-03 Thread David Lehman
On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 12:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Hi Adam! Thanks for bringing this up again. > So...what should we do? Here are the options as I see 'em: > > 1. Keep supporting btrfs > 2. Just modify the criterion with a btrfs exception, even if it's > weird > 3. Rewrite

Re: Blocker status of RHBZ #1033778 (shrinking unknown volumes)

2016-02-29 Thread David Lehman
On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 06:58 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 09:29 -0500, David Lehman wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 14:03 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 09:40 -0500, David Lehman wrote: > > > > &g

Re: anaconda design mockups

2016-02-25 Thread David Lehman
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 16:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:14:24AM +0100, Garrett LeSage wrote: > > So, what do you think? > > Lots of good ideas. One note in specific... you mention that server > will only be installed onto systems with no OS. This isn't > necessarily