Alle 08.32 Wednesday 10/05/2000 +0200, Jaroslav Fikker ha mandato a Marco
questo messaggio:
I use Analog 4.1 and I have probel with Domain Report. In my log file I
have many domain (com, org, net, cz, ...), but in the Domain Report I get
only cz domain and [domain not given]. Where is problem?
Hi,
use something as
LOGFILE /var/log/httpd/*access*
Enjoy,
Josef D.
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Edylie wrote:
Every monday analog stats.html would start new again.
I have check /var/log/httpd
access_log access_log.1 error_log error_log.1
I know that caused the problem. is there any way i
Ahh, see how fast that was implemented! :)
thanks for the help. RTFM eh?
So, in fact, when Analog identifies which browser strings go with which browser
summary options, isn't this something we can add into the configuration? Or, does
this need to be programmed into the source code?
For
Am I correct in thinking that the GET or POST for each request is junked
Yep- Stephen explained that to me a couple months ago. The philosophy
seems to be that GET/HEAD/POST aren't usually different enough to worry
about. Designing your site so that nothing "self-posts" is probably good
for
As in the other thread right now, PAGEINCLUDE sets the types of files that
are counted as pages. PAGEEXCLUDE, removes types, equivalently. The default
setting that Analog ships with is
PAGEINCLUDE */,*.htm,*.html
The first matches directory requests "/" and the others standard match html
hi there,
I've been struggling to reconcile traffic reports from analog and webtrends
for a while now. I strongly favor analog, but I've found one item where
webtrends seems to have the upper hand: screening spiders. I've found some
references on your FAQ but they don't quite answer my question.
hi folks,
i've got a problem with uncompressing my log-file-zip for analysing.
(using analog version 4.1 on linux suse 6.3)
unfortunately the config-switch UNCOMPRESS *.gz "gzip -cd"
doesn't work well on my system. i have tested some older versions
which had no problems with
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Richard N. Law wrote:
Seems to matter in 4.0. The referring pages in question had .shtml
extensions (which is *far* too similar to .html when you've been staring
at logs all morning ;] ). By adding PAGEINCLUDE *.html,*.htm,*/,*.cgi,*.shtml
to my config, all counts
"Sean D. Ackley" wrote:
So, in fact, when Analog identifies which browser strings go with which browser
summary options, isn't this something we can add into the configuration? Or, does
this need to be programmed into the source code?
It is built into the program. Analog recognizes the de
At 17:02 10-05-2000, Walter Vannini wrote:
what does it mean that my REFSITE report gives:
#pages: %pages: URL
403: 0,32%: http://firstsite.com/
240: 0,19%: http://secondsite.com/
91: 0,07%: http://thirdsite.com/
...many entries later...
125887: 98,86%: [not listed: 9 URLs] (gosh!!!)
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Richard N. Law wrote:
Using *nix analog 4.0, I have found that there are many referring sites
that are either completely missing from the referring site report or
have counts that are completely wrong. This is readily verifiable using
a simple grep. In analyzing just one
Using *nix analog 4.0, I have found that there are many referring sites
that are either completely missing from the referring site report or
have counts that are completely wrong. This is readily verifiable using
a simple grep. In analyzing just one week's worth of logs, I have several
cases of
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon R Jones wrote:
hi there
Is it possible to include the referring page on the Failure report (or the
page linked to on the Referrer report)??
No. This is in the FAQ.
--
Stephen Turner http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical
The problem was LOGCONFIG. I had "%r" instad of "%j %r %j"
Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
As in the other thread right now, PAGEINCLUDE sets the types of files that
are counted as pages. PAGEEXCLUDE, removes types, equivalently. The default
setting that Analog ships with is
PAGEINCLUDE
William Martin wrote:
BROWEXCLUDE *spider*,*spyder*,*crawler* etc.
BROWEXCLUDE *Spider*,*Spyder*
There has been threads on the list at varying times about a collaborative list
of browsers and spiders. I believe Marco Bernardini is hosting those at the
moment. Check the Analog Helper
Also remember that NT IIS4 will invariably add extra status lines into
your log files. These are called the MS-EXTENDED headers. They
identify when a logging pattern has changed. I found out that Analog
barfs when these headers get placed anywhere else inside the logfile
other than the
Successful requests: 5,682
Average successful requests per day: 5,700
Shouldn't the numbers be the same when generating the daily reports.
FAQ section C4 at http://analog.cx/docs/faq.html#underfaq - yours is
the same issue described there. Look at the "Analyzed requests from" line
in
"Sean D. Ackley" wrote:
Also remember that NT IIS4 will invariably add extra status lines into your log
files. These are called the MS-EXTENDED headers. They identify when a logging
pattern has changed. I found out that Analog barfs when these headers get placed
anywhere else inside the
hi there
Is it possible to include the referring page on the Failure report (or the
page linked to on the Referrer report)??
I would like to be able to get a report that tells me which files have error
codes (ie. Failure Report) but also telling me where the errors came from
(the referrer
"Sean D. Ackley" wrote:
If a browser comes in that is not recognized, that Analog simply just display the
actual browser information that is displayed, and calculate hits based on that new
data?
It does. That's called the Browser Report.
Or even make that an option, where the analog
Hi
When generating the daily reports, the numbers of Successful requests the
number of Average successful requests per day are different. Why is that?
For Example,
Successful requests: 5,682
Average successful requests per day: 5,700
Shouldn't the numbers be the same when generating the
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Richard N. Law wrote:
But you didn't REFINCLUDE pages, did you?
Yes, I did. It was defined before I added the PAGEINCLUDE.
Is that a bad idea?
Yes. That means that only requests with matching referrers will be counted,
in all reports.
(As I say, in 4.1 it
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Richard N. Law wrote:
What I did find
regarding successful vs. unsuccessful requests doesn't apply, since all
these are successful requests (200) for straight html pages (i.e. not jpg's
or something not *INCLUDEd).
Oh, well, that was what I was thinking, that they
Using *nix analog 4.0, I have found that there are many referring sites
that are either completely missing from the referring site report or
have counts that are completely wrong. This is readily verifiable using
a simple grep. In analyzing just one week's worth of logs, I have several
I have
REFSITEFLOOR 1
what does it mean that my REFSITE report gives:
#pages: %pages: URL
403: 0,32%: http://firstsite.com/
240: 0,19%: http://secondsite.com/
91: 0,07%: http://thirdsite.com/
...many entries later...
125887: 98,86%: [not listed: 9 URLs] (gosh!!!)
Now, 125887
I checked, and there are no cgi pages. If you check out the log
(now it is http://www.packstrat.com/logs/index2.html
you will see that there are requests for "/" which are not
showing up as #pages. There is javascript on the page. Is there
some way of making every request for "/" to be
Analog will recognize ASP pages, I use the following in my analog config file. As for
the GET .vs. POST, Stephen may need to explain that as to how Analog actually parses
those.
---
LOGFORMAT MS-EXTENDED
PAGEINCLUDE *.html,*.htm,*.shtml,*.asp,*.sql,*.php3,*/,*.cgi
TYPEOUTPUTALIAS .asp
On 5/10/00 1:03 PM Edward Lucas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Finally, my company needs "marketing" stats (the tenuous stuff that
Analog specifically does not do). I was considering "Web Trends". Could
any of you seasoned campaigners offer some 'least worst option' advice
on such packages?
Daniel Quappe wrote:
unfortunately the config-switch UNCOMPRESS *.gz "gzip -cd"
doesn't work well on my system.
What uncompress does work? Try it from the command line until you get the
right switches and put that in your config.
HTH,
Jeremy Wadsack
Wadsack-Allen Digital Group
Thanks :-)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: [analog-help] access_log
Hi,
use something as
LOGFILE /var/log/httpd/*access*
Enjoy,
Josef D.
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Edylie wrote:
Every monday
Thank you for the biggest laugh I've had in about four months!
Michael
Walter Vannini wrote:
At 17:02 10-05-2000, Walter Vannini wrote:
what does it mean that my REFSITE report gives:
#pages: %pages: URL
403: 0,32%: http://firstsite.com/
240: 0,19%: http://secondsite.com/
91:
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Richard N. Law wrote:
I will follow Walter's example and answer my own question:
The referring page file extensions must be included within PAGEINCLUDE
if they are anything other than default. PAGEINCLUDE percolates thru the
other '*INCLUDE pages' directives, so if a
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Richard N. Law wrote:
I will follow Walter's example and answer my own question:
The referring page file extensions must be included within PAGEINCLUDE
if they are anything other than default. PAGEINCLUDE percolates thru the
other '*INCLUDE pages' directives, so
Alle 13.26 Wednesday 10/05/2000 -0700, Jeremy Wadsack ha mandato a Marco
questo messaggio:
William Martin wrote:
BROWEXCLUDE *spider*,*spyder*,*crawler* etc.
BROWEXCLUDE *Spider*,*Spyder*
There has been threads on the list at varying times about a collaborative list
of browsers and
Edward Lucas wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that the GET or POST for each request is junked
and cannot be used by Analog?
Yes, Analog does not use or process that field.
- I have some .asp forms that are called
using GET but then POST to themselves. Not being able to split them
35 matches
Mail list logo
