re/Modules/init/bash, which is causing
>> arbitrary bash code that can use any binary to be run on every
>> non-interactive bash shell startup.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:50 AM Michael Goffioul <
>> michael.goffi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Y
low through is always
> trying to call manpath? Let me know what you find, we've definitely been
> shrinking this list on master.
>
> - Dan
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:54 PM Michael Goffioul <
> michael.goffi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm using Fedora 30 to build
I have several custom modules that download content (if not already
present) during build, with wget. This uses additional rules in the
corresponding Android.mk files. These used to work in Pie, but in Q the
rule fail with "Name or service not found". Running the exact same command
outside the
s used. Probably wget or external connections are blocked.
>
> BR, K
>
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
> --
> *From:* android-building@googlegroups.com <
> android-building@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Michael Goffio
Hi,
I'm trying to build Android Q (for android-x86, 32-bits) and I'm having a
problem in the generated apex for com.android.media.swcodec, where there
are a bunch of libraries missing in
$TARGET_OUT/system/apex/com.android.media.swcodec/lib/.
The directory does contain various deps like
On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 3:53:13 PM UTC-4, Michael Goffioul wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build Android Q (for android-x86, 32-bits) and I'm having a
> problem in the generated apex for com.android.media.swcodec, where there
> are a bunch of libraries missing in
> $T
android.system.OsConstants.initConstants() in an
unstarted non-transactional runtime
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 6:59 PM Michael Goffioul
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 6:52 PM Michael Goffioul <
> michael.goffi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm still experimenting with android-r-prev
ld and new projects.
>
> - Dan
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:10 PM Guoyin Chen
> wrote:
>
>> There are quite a lot of build error with android-preview-2 build. I
>> think google have several wrong tag on different gits.
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 8:41
I'm experimenting with android-r-preview-2 and found a problem compiling
mesa, which didn't occur with android-10. The error occurs when running
flex:
23:56:24 Disallowed PATH tool "m4" used: []string{"m4", "-P"}
23:56:24 See
referenced in the r4 manifest[2].
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/packages/apps/Car/libs/+/refs/tags/android-12.1.0_r4/androidx-car/Android.bp
>
> [2]
> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/manifest/+/refs/heads/android-12.1.0_r4/default.xml#832
&g
Soong fails with the following error:
error: frameworks/opt/car/setupwizard/library/main/Android.bp:20:1:
"car-setup-wizard-lib" depends on undefined module
"androidx.car_car-resources-partially-dejetified"
>From what I can see, the code in packages/apps/Car/libs/androidx-car/ has
been moved to
I forgot to mention the Android version is 7.1.2.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:34 PM Michael Goffioul
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been compiling an arm64 firmware (for AMLogic chipset) on the same
> Fedora-based system for a couple of years now. Today, after rebuilding from
> s
Hi,
I've been compiling an arm64 firmware (for AMLogic chipset) on the same
Fedora-based system for a couple of years now. Today, after rebuilding from
scratch, I faced the following error. Would anybody have any insight on
what is going on?
[100% 2/2] build
Goffioul
wrote:
> I forgot to mention the Android version is 7.1.2.
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:34 PM Michael Goffioul <
> michael.goffi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been compiling an arm64 firmware (for AMLogic chipset) on the same
>> Fedora-
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 8:30 AM Michael Goffioul
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 8:58 PM 'Dan Willemsen' via Android Building <
> android-building@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> Have you tried to reproduce with a newer version of Android? Android 7 is
>>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 8:58 PM 'Dan Willemsen' via Android Building <
android-building@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Have you tried to reproduce with a newer version of Android? Android 7 is
> about 6 years old, so I wouldn't be expecting any changes to it.
>
> You may want to talk to your
I'm using a source tree derived from manifest android-13.0.0_r4. The build
also adds audio.a2dp.default to PRODUCT_PACKAGES. The ckati step then fails
with the following error:
build/make/core/tasks/platform_availability_check.mk:37: warning:
Following modules are requested to be installed. But
It turned out the problem was caused by the presence of a file
in PRODUCT_COPY_FILES that contains a comma in its filename. This
interferes with the macro expansion of make. We'll have to test the
proposed commit, but from a first inspection, I think the problem will
still be present, as the
the mainline
> module instead.
>
> - Dan
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 6:11 PM Michael Goffioul <
> michael.goffi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm using a source tree derived from manifest android-13.0.0_r4. The
>> build also adds audio.a2dp.default to PRODUCT_PACKAG
orks fine on 32 bits, falls flat on
64 bits.
Not sure if anybody at Google is reading this, but you might wanna have a
look at that more closely.
Michael.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:09 PM Michael Goffioul
wrote:
> Is there a particular reason to keep the external camera service a 32-bit
&
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:32 AM 'enh' via Android Building <
android-building@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 5:17 PM Michael Goffioul <
> michael.goffi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, it turns out I believe there's invalid code in the external ca
Since this commit, webrtc audio processing module is compiled with AVX2
enabled.
https://cs.android.com/android/_/android/platform/external/webrtc/+/b5b78192e10ba90978fb8228e7eb9fcf75c83f0c
This makes the module fail to load on platforms that do not support AVX2.
E.g. generates SIGILL at a
Hello? Anybody out there?
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 9:29 AM Michael Goffioul
wrote:
> Any update on this? I guess that now that the cat's out of the bag, it'll
> be difficult to put it back in, and AVX2 is a de facto ABI requirement.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 1:13 PM 'e
23 matches
Mail list logo
