Thanks, that post didn't come up in my searches, hence I asked here.
On Friday, November 23, 2012 3:23:44 AM UTC-8, TreKing wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Franzi Roesner
franzi@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Right, my question is, why are Fragments better / why were they created
Hi,
I know that ActivityGroup is deprecated, and that Fragments should be used
instead. My question is out of curiosity: why was it deprecated?
Thanks!
Franzi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send
Right, my question is, why are Fragments better / why were they created?
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 5:03:33 PM UTC-8, TreKing wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Franzi Roesner
franzi@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I know that ActivityGroup is deprecated, and that Fragments
Hi,
I'm trying to send a custom Parcelable to another application (in another
process).
I have a client and a remote service, as well as an abstract class (say,
AbstractCustomParcelable) that I added to the Android framework itself (for
research purposes). The remote service should receive
of this (particularly the
CONTEXT_IGNORE_SECURITY flag)?
Thanks!
Franzi
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:36:19 AM UTC-7, Franzi Roesner wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to send a custom Parcelable to another application (in another
process).
I have a client and a remote service, as well
Hi,
I'm wondering about the Java SecurityManager within Android. I
understand that it doesn't provide the isolation/security required by
Android (and that java.lang.System throws an exception if you try to
setSecurityManager), but I'm wondering what the consequences of using
it (in addition to
I'll try that, thanks!
Franzi
On Feb 2, 3:07 pm, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote:
Probably not at the SDK level. You may have better luck inquiring on
one of the Google Groups for the open source project
(http://source.android.com).
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Franzi
Hi,
In android.view.LayoutInflater, non-fully qualified classes are
expanded to android.view.ClassName -- why not
android.widget.ClassName for classes that are in the widget package?
(Some context, if helpful: I'm working on a research project that
involves making some changes to the UI toolkit,
8 matches
Mail list logo
