Another approach would be to package the extract functionality as
different activities and services, in a completely new APK. Users
would install the lite free version and then when they want more
features they can pay and install the extra package.
Using the PackageManager or via Intents you
Maybe you can build your app using Maven or Ant? I think it should be
possible to configure building both a free app and a paid app based on
the same source. Even package renaming and all that can be handled.
On Apr 21, 11:34 am, jarkman jark...@gmail.com wrote:
For what it is worth, the 1.5
On Apr 20, 6:58 am, jarkman jark...@gmail.com wrote:
We actually maintain two separate codebases for our pro and light
products ...
Yuck. I was afraid that would be the answer. I don't know what Sun
was thinking when they decided to have no pre-processor for Java.
I'll try the if
On Apr 20, 1:23 pm, Mariano Kamp mariano.k...@gmail.com wrote:
But isn't the real problem that you would need a totally different
package name to upload it to the Android Market?
I'd love to hear if anyone has an elegant solution for this. Mine is
very ugly:
I have one manifest file for my
For what it is worth, the 1.5 SDK does move the R.java out into a
different directory (myProject/gen/com.needle.noo), which may solve
one of your problems.
But I don't see how you'd get round having the package name in all the
source files (or, at least, in all the activities so on) without
But isn't the real problem that you would need a totally different
package name to upload it to the Android Market?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:04 PM, MrSnowflake mrsnowfl...@gmail.com wrote:
You can use if-else constructs, as the compiler will leave out any
never reached peaces of code.
We actually maintain two separate codebases for our pro and light
products, and take care to port common changes across from one to the
other. They need different package names in the manifest file, in the
layout xml when we refer to custom controls, in the package
declaration at the top of each
Yes, I'll probably do it that way if I can't find another way.
Problem is that I also want to remove a lot of code from a case()
statement, remove a lot of functions that won't be called, and remove
a lot of resources. Are we sure that the Java compiler will actually
remove the dead code?
I
8 matches
Mail list logo
