Thanks, i was a bit off there. It is working now.
Regards
Carl Magnus
On 14 Okt, 18:23, Marco Nelissen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Carl wrote:
>
> > I've copied the folder from the JDK and put it in the SDK. Nothing
> > changed.
>
> Copying the folder is probably not the right t
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Carl wrote:
>
> I've copied the folder from the JDK and put it in the SDK. Nothing
> changed.
Copying the folder is probably not the right thing to do, especially
if you didn't add the new folder to your path either (by 'path' I mean
the windows path environment
I've copied the folder from the JDK and put it in the SDK. Nothing
changed.
Noticed another problem, it is telling me that i'm missing a SWT
folder. That i need to point ANDROID_SWT to the folder containing
swt.jar.
But i've looked in the android.bat and ANDROID_SWT is pointing to that
folder.
wh
I've copied the folder from the JDK and put it in the SDK. Nothing
changed.
Noticed another problem, it is telling me that i'm missing a SWT
folder. That i need to point ANDROID_SWT to the folder containing
swt.jar.
But i've looked in the android.bat and ANDROID_SWT is pointing to that
folder.
wh
I've copied the folder from the JDK and put it in the SDK. Nothing
changed.
Noticed another problem, it is telling me that i'm missing a SWT
folder. That i need to point ANDROID_SWT to the folder containing
swt.jar.
But i've looked in the android.bat and ANDROID_SWT is pointing to that
folder.
wh
Well, given the error message you mentioned in your original post, the
folder where java.exe is located would be good to have in your path.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Carl wrote:
>
> Could you maybe then tell me the relevant parts of the JDK? so that i
> can check if they are there.
>
> T
Could you maybe then tell me the relevant parts of the JDK? so that i
can check if they are there.
Thanks.
On 14 Okt, 00:12, Marco Nelissen wrote:
> Sorry, I meant 'JDK'.
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Marco Nelissen wrote:
> > I don't think it matters as long as the relevant parts of th
Sorry, I meant 'JDK'.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Marco Nelissen wrote:
> I don't think it matters as long as the relevant parts of the SDK are
> in your path.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Carl wrote:
>>
>> I have a JDK installed on C: but put the SDK on D:. Does it matter?
>>
>>
I don't think it matters as long as the relevant parts of the SDK are
in your path.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Carl wrote:
>
> I have a JDK installed on C: but put the SDK on D:. Does it matter?
>
>
>
> On 13 Okt, 22:24, Marco Nelissen wrote:
>> Sounds like you didn't install a JDK, or i
I have a JDK installed on C: but put the SDK on D:. Does it matter?
On 13 Okt, 22:24, Marco Nelissen wrote:
> Sounds like you didn't install a JDK, or it's not in your path.
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Carl wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > When i'm in the directory tools and try to use "andro
Sounds like you didn't install a JDK, or it's not in your path.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Carl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When i'm in the directory tools and try to use "android create avd..."
> i get an error like " ' java is not recognizable as an internal or
> external command, operable prog
11 matches
Mail list logo
