I have created the ant build as suggested by you but I can't figure it
out.
Unfortunantly I haven't got a day for this... :(
Can't understand how it is possible that there is no guide on how to
do that in a fast way.
On Aug 9, 5:54 pm, Bob Kerns wrote:
> Well, I suggested a better approach to se
After local.properties, the next problem sounds like your script is
missing a "setup" call.
It's not too difficult to incorporate Proguard, and the payback can be
significant in some situations.
For a sample template, see the "optimize" target in the zxing source:
http://code.google.c
Well, I suggested a better approach to setting up your ant script, and
we haven't heard back from you on that, so I guess that counts as no
news...
I've extracted the relevant sections from your reply below, in case
you missed it.
You haven't told us of any problem with ProGuard -- the last thing
so no news about obfuscating with Proguard?
On Aug 4, 10:47 pm, DanH wrote:
> "And my experience (non-Dalvik, to be sure) is that 'Class loading
> time
> goes up, execution efficiency is reduced' is incorrect, that the
> opposite results -- in fact, that's one of the reasons to consider
> obfusca
"And my experience (non-Dalvik, to be sure) is that 'Class loading
time
goes up, execution efficiency is reduced' is incorrect, that the
opposite results -- in fact, that's one of the reasons to consider
obfuscation despite the pitfalls -- so I think bad advice is being
handed out with the good her
On 2 August 2010 16:22, dys wrote:
> For one of my applications I had to use progard (more to strip unused
> classes than really to obfuscate. I made a small bat script beginning
> after the initial compilation (still made in Eclipse) and calling
> AAPT, PROGARD, DX, APKBUILDER, JARSIGNER and ZIPA
For one of my applications I had to use progard (more to strip unused
classes than really to obfuscate. I made a small bat script beginning
after the initial compilation (still made in Eclipse) and calling
AAPT, PROGARD, DX, APKBUILDER, JARSIGNER and ZIPALIGN. Are you
interested ?
On 1 août, 14:08
I disagree. It's off topic.
Except for the point about it being harder to decompile Dalvik byte
codes, but that's just a matter of some tool development work.
And my experience (non-Dalvik, to be sure) is that "Class loading time
goes up, execution efficiency is reduced" is incorrect, that the
op
Pointing out the pitfalls of obfuscation is NOT "moving the thread off
topic". For in order for you to understand the answer to your
immediate question, "has anyone had success" at it, you have to
understand what 'success' could MEAN in the context. And DanH has been
quite generous with exactly the
Thanks for your reply, very appreciated.
I'm hanging there...
Since google recommends obfuscation, why don't ask it to release a
guide on how to obfuscate apk?
On Aug 1, 7:27 am, Miguel Morales wrote:
> Looks like that's defined in:
> ant/ant_rules_r2.xml and templates/android_rules.xml
> not s
Looks like that's defined in:
ant/ant_rules_r2.xml and templates/android_rules.xml
not sure where this is supposed to be included. you'll have to figure that out.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:38 AM, sblantipodi
wrote:
> Wow, thanks this maked me goes forward to next error :)
> thanks...
>
> Target "
Wow, thanks this maked me goes forward to next error :)
thanks...
Target "package-resources" does not exist in the project
what does it means, how can I specify package-resources?
Thanks.
On Jul 30, 11:34 pm, Miguel Morales wrote:
> Make sure you have the included files such as:
>
>
> Which sh
Make sure you have the included files such as:
Which should have:
sdk.dir=/path/to/sdk_root
Which should have:
sdk-location=/path/to/sdk_root
and
Which should have:
target=android-3 ##or whatever
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:00 PM, sblantipodi
wrote:
> done, same problem... :(
>
> On Jul 30
done, same problem... :(
On Jul 30, 7:46 pm, Mark Murphy wrote:
> If this is a normal Android project, run android update project -p
> ..., where ... is the path to your project, and it will create or
> repair your local.properties file.
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM, sblantipodi
>
> wrote
I have listed it in the main.xml, the problem seems that ant doesn't
find the SDK...
if you found my error on google
"taskdef class com.android.ant.SetupTask cannot be found"
you will find dozens of people with my same problem,
but I can't find a solution yet...
On Jul 30, 6:59 pm, Frank Weiss w
If this is a normal Android project, run android update project -p
..., where ... is the path to your project, and it will create or
repair your local.properties file.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM, sblantipodi
wrote:
> I have listed it in the main.xml, the problem seems that ant doesn't
> find
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:14 AM, sblantipodi
wrote:
> Ok, since I founded no way to automatically do it with netbeans now
> I'm trying the ant way posted here:
> http://just2us.com/2009/07/tutorial-obfuscate-an-android-application/
> previously in this thread.
>
> I followed all the instructions b
You are so kind answering me and I really appreciate it
but there are many answers, all are off topic.
I haven't asked if it is good to obfuscate or if I need to switch to
NDK,
I asked if someone succeded obfuscating standard android class using
ant.
Please don't move this thread off topic.
Thanks
Keep in mind that what goes onto the phone isn't Java bytecodes but
rather the Dalvik translation. Much harder to back-translate than
bytecodes.
(I've seen obfuscated bytecodes and it's not pretty. Class loading
time goes up, execution efficiency is reduced, the odds of hitting a
bug, either in
Well, how about going native? (NDK) That should be somewhat more
challenging than decompiling java.
Good luck / Jonas
On 07/30/2010 04:11 PM, sblantipodi wrote:
Ok, thanks for the suggestions, any other idea? :)
On Jul 30, 2:59 pm, DanH wrote:
Just say no to obfuscation.
On Jul 30
Ok, thanks for the suggestions, any other idea? :)
On Jul 30, 2:59 pm, DanH wrote:
> Just say no to obfuscation.
>
> On Jul 30, 3:36 am, sblantipodi wrote:
>
> > Since I'm going mad trying obfuscating my projects on Netbeans and
> > it's not reasonable
> > at the moment for me to switch to Eclip
Just say no to obfuscation.
On Jul 30, 3:36 am, sblantipodi wrote:
> Since I'm going mad trying obfuscating my projects on Netbeans and
> it's not reasonable
> at the moment for me to switch to Eclipse I need a command line script
> that let me
> build and obfuscate my APK...
>
> Is there some ex
Ok, since I founded no way to automatically do it with netbeans now
I'm trying the ant way posted here:
http://just2us.com/2009/07/tutorial-obfuscate-an-android-application/
previously in this thread.
I followed all the instructions but I get this error from ant o_O
taskdef class com.android.ant.
23 matches
Mail list logo
