On Sep 25, 5:03 am, Ganesh wrote:
> So the video system knows that it is behind audio by X which can be
> sent to the extractor.
I don't think the system can know this information, as all the audio
and video packets are interleaved. The system is forced to process
them in order and is unable to
Hi Doug,
Many thanks for responding to my query. I completely agree with your
explanation. To ensure that end-user experience is fine, audio
shouldn't be compromised with. However, I had a related point. If the
CPU is not sufficient for video decoding, the current algorithm will
drop the frames.
On Sep 19, 5:00 pm, Ganesh wrote:
> In these scenarios, shouldn't the system be able to resynchronize
> faster i.e. skip frames at parser level and start decoding from a key
> frame at the new position?
>
> Could someone explain why a similar strategy wasn't adopted?
Is there software that you kn
3 matches
Mail list logo
