[android-developers] Re: Inadvertent breakage by SDK going forward

2010-02-15 Thread Mike Collins
Reworking the platform isn't an option...guess that leaves me with some naming convention. thanks, mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To

[android-developers] Re: Inadvertent breakage by SDK going forward

2010-02-15 Thread jasper
And doesn't this also mean that there's an implicit requirement that I prefix my methods with a tag to avoid future version name collisions? If I have a method in my 1.6 app called MyView.doSomething(), and MyView extends an Android class like TextView, and subsequent to 1.6, Google adds a method

[android-developers] Re: Inadvertent breakage by SDK going forward

2010-02-15 Thread jasper
Does this truly mean that even if I compile to the 1.6 platform, if my code implements a 2.1 callback method, that method will *never* be invoked on 1.6 devices but *will* be invoked on 2.1 devices? Even though I compiled to the 1.6 platform? That's crazy! On Feb 12, 4:01 pm, Mike Collins

[android-developers] Re: Inadvertent breakage by SDK going forward

2010-02-15 Thread Streets Of Boston
That would be very 'icky'... I hoped that the 'targetSdkVersion' setting could prevent this. On Feb 12, 7:20 pm, jasper jasper...@gmail.com wrote: Does this truly mean that even if I compile to the 1.6 platform, if my code implements a 2.1 callback method, that method will *never* be invoked