Re: [android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

09.03.2011 17:54, Nathan пишет: In preferences, under Java->Compiler, it most definitely says 1.6. Did you check project-specific settings as well? Right click on a project, select Properties, then Java compiler. Make sure that project-specific settings are either off, or are also set to 1.6.

[android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

In preferences, under Java->Compiler, it most definitely says 1.6. But since Helios supports 64 bit now, there is just a chance that I need the 64 bit JDK now. Otherwise I'm not sure where to look. Nathan On Mar 8, 11:01 pm, Kostya Vasilyev wrote: > Should 1.6, this error means you have it set

Re: [android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

Should 1.6, this error means you have it set to 1.5. 09.03.2011 8:05 пользователь "Nathan" написал: > I've installed 3.6.2. Still not getting clean builds. > > I am getting a zillion 'method must override a superclass method'. I > think that means that the JDK compliance level is off or something

[android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

I've installed 3.6.2. Still not getting clean builds. I am getting a zillion 'method must override a superclass method'. I think that means that the JDK compliance level is off or something like that, but I can't remember what it should be. Nathan -- You received this message because you are su

Re: [android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Xavier Ducrohet wrote: > There may have been some instabilities when 3.5 was released that was a > while ago. > > We clearly screwed up in telling people about the 3.5 requirements. > > We're going to prepare a patch to make ADT not install on 3.4 so that it's > mo

Re: [android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

Yes. 3.5+ is fine. On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Brad Gies wrote: > Is 3.6 ok? > > Sincerely, > > Brad Gies > --- > Bistro Bot - Bistro Blurb > http://bgies.com            http://nocrappyapps.com > http://bistroblurb.com      h

Re: [android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

Is 3.6 ok? Sincerely, Brad Gies --- Bistro Bot - Bistro Blurb http://bgies.comhttp://nocrappyapps.com http://bistroblurb.com http://forcethetruth.com http://ihottonight.com --

Re: [android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

There may have been some instabilities when 3.5 was released that was a while ago. We clearly screwed up in telling people about the 3.5 requirements. We're going to prepare a patch to make ADT not install on 3.4 so that it's more clear, and we'll fix the dev site. Xav On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:

Re: [android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Xavier Ducrohet wrote: > Would either of you be using Eclipse 3.4 by any chance? > Yup. > ADT now requires 3.5 (we screwed up and the doc wasn't updated), and > I think this action uses a method that doesn't exist in 3.4 > Interesting. I thought 3.5 was "unstab

Re: [android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

Would either of you be using Eclipse 3.4 by any chance? ADT now requires 3.5 (we screwed up and the doc wasn't updated), and I think this action uses a method that doesn't exist in 3.4 Xav On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:54 PM, TreKing wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Taf wrote: >> >> Would h

Re: [android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Taf wrote: > Would have been nice if the Add button worked though.. > Seriously. I wasted like 2 hours on something that should have taken 5 seconds. - TreKing

[android-developers] Re: Lost libraries after updating ADT and SDK

Thanks for the reminder of looking at the samples, looked up the TicTacToe example. It was the default.properties that i needed to update in the project that was trying to reference the library. Need to add line something like: android.library.reference.1=..// Now shows project is referenced in t