On Dec 1, 8:22 am, "Mina Ramses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried the code below in eclipse using android sdk 1.0, but always can't
> get the
> application to run correctly neither got any of the testing statements in
> the logCat, i used to set appServer as the default activity and tried to
That's what i got as output from both Console and logCat
Console:
Starting activity on mina.home.com.appServer device
ActivityManager: Starting: Intent { comp={mina.home/
mina.home.com.appServer) }
DDMS LogCat:
12-06 14:24:36.167: WARN/ActivityManager(50): Activity pause timeout
for HistoryReco
Im having a problem adding hese jars to my project for multipart form
posts.
I added commons io no problem.
But when i add httpmime or mime4j i dont receive the BOOT_COMPLETED
Intent.
This seems very strange, why would adding these jars affect receiving
this intent?
On Sep 28, 5:10 am, gjs <[E
I used -
org.apache.http.entity.FileEntity
- instead...
On Sep 29, 12:10 am, gjs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hmm, I think these jars are packaged into the .apk, I can see lot of
> references inside classes.dex to these libraries and the size of the
> generated .apk and .dex files would
Hi,
Hmm, I think these jars are packaged into the .apk, I can see lot of
references inside classes.dex to these libraries and the size of the
generated .apk and .dex files would seem to indicate that this true.
I would still like an answer re correct way to do this in V1.0.
Google/Justin/Megha
gjs, yeap it worksin the eumlator, but I wonder if it will work on the
real phone since emulator uses your classpath with the dedicated jars,
but these jars are not packed into apk I guess, so they might be not
available to the real world phone app
On Sep 26, 7:14 pm, gjs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I have found that the method described for V0.9 still works ok in
V1.0...
On Sep 26, 4:11 pm, gjs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does this mean that we still have to use the method described for
> V0,9 ?
>
> As discussed in -
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_frm/
vast no, but there is, with sqlite for exemple
2008/9/26 dhuri natarajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is there any vast difference between the SDK released 1.0 and 0.9 beta?.
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Release notes for 1.0r1: http://code.google.com/android/RELEASENOTES.html
Overview of changes in 1.0r1 compared to 0.9:
http://code.google.com/android/migrating/0.9-1.0/changes-overview.html
API differences in 1.0r1 compared to 0.9:
http://code.google.com/android/migrating/0.9-1.0/changes.html
On
Hi,
Does this mean that we still have to use the method described for
V0,9 ?
As discussed in -
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_frm/thread/e4230ed22c196772
Anybody ?
Regards
On Sep 25, 3:48 pm, shotwave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> umm, no, I do not tink that this aff
umm, no, I do not tink that this affects te browser, it is all about
the http clien api included into sdk
On Sep 25, 12:44 am, "Shane Isbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this mean that the browser itself also no longer supports multipart
> content?
>
> Thanks,
> Shane
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 20
Does this mean that the browser itself also no longer supports multipart
content?
Thanks,
Shane
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:38 PM, shotwave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> the Multipart entities were removed from http commons, so in order to
> use them in SDK 0.9 we had to use external jars
12 matches
Mail list logo
