I doubt it's that, as much as it is that Google legal won't be reading
this mailing list. Google engineers are likely going to get in hot
water if they make comments regarding the company's stance on their
legalese, and so I doubt any of them would do it. And finding the
right person to direct
I'm not a lawyer, but no, you can't. You'll be attempting to profit
off a trademark.
In fact, even making your game seem too similar to space invaders
might get you a takedown.
Kris
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:47 AM, 'Michal K.' via Android Developers
wrote:
What metrics did you usually use to check app integrity?
E.g., file checksum?
Kris
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:48 PM, jtoolsdev wrote:
> Along with the suggestions from the are depending on your app when you check
> for those things maybe make the app seem it is running
pirating an APK is easy: get it, take it off the device, change the
package name, repackage it as your own, put it up on google play.
Send google play a takedown notice and hope for the best.
Kris
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:25 AM, WeiHung wrote:
> I have an paid app
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27718713/while-running-android-avd-manger-it-shows-error-hax-kernel-module-is-not-instal
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Krystal Balduc
wrote:
> Hello, I apologize if this isn't the correct forum for this support request.
> I
http://developer.android.com/tools/debugging/debugging-tracing.html
http://developer.android.com/tools/help/systrace.html
Kris
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Howard Cornell
wrote:
> App performance is one of the most crucial factors that determines the
> success
I'm not sure what the problem is: the method to do this has been in
the API since level 1.
> Viewinflate(XmlPullParser parser, ViewGroup root)
> Inflate a new view hierarchy from the specified xml node.
Create an XmlPullParser, set the reader to one you've pointed at the
URI containing the
What? No it doesn't:
http://www.androidhive.info/2011/11/android-xml-parsing-tutorial/
Kris
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Luis Carlos Ramírez Rodríguez
wrote:
> The problem is that XmlPullParser requires for the XML definition to be
> present at the APK build-time. What
Sorry, that was a bad link. It didn't talk about pull parsers, but
rather DOM parsers. Here's a better one:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5409940/android-xml-pull-parser-from-url
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Kristopher Micinski
<krismicin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What? No i
You should also be aware that the Systrace tool has been introduced.
http://developer.android.com/tools/help/systrace.html
Kris
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Karthik k wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Traceview is used to profile the Android apps. For Android version <= 4.4,
>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Mark Phillips
wrote:
> I recently posted to stack overflow and received more and faster responses
> (ie no responses from this list). When I google for an android issue, I get
> lots of stack overflow response.
Along with this, I think
Generally someone doesn't really care about the way you wrote your
java code. Few people have code that actually needs protecting. If
you're running something you don't want to give out to someone, you
should never be sending the code to them anyway (you should run it via
a service).
Kris
On
Proguard will definitely help, but the basic answer is that it's
impossible. If you can run the APK you can extract it. Proguard
makes it much harder to determine what's going on because method names
will be obfuscated, but (e.g.,) framework methods will still be
visible (since they're
Why do you want to do this? is a better response than this is a
totally stupid design and is not possible! If someone asks about the
use of a certain feature for a use which it's not designed, it usually
is because they are trying to do something that could be accomplished
by another method for
and office's miles apart?
This is a internal office app , if sms is not the way, then we
need a more optimal method.
On Mar 31, 2015 7:01 PM, Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Using SMS to communicate *between* apps on the phone!?
You should 100
, Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com
wrote:
What's the motivation for doing this?
It seems kind of counterintuitive that you'd want to do this, because
presumably if the user *does* send a text, they want a record of it.
It's easy to imagine a spam app which sends tons of texts and leaves
What's the motivation for doing this?
It seems kind of counterintuitive that you'd want to do this, because
presumably if the user *does* send a text, they want a record of it.
It's easy to imagine a spam app which sends tons of texts and leaves
no trace of it for the user to see!
But I'm a
The main hypothesis I'm wondering about is how developers pass data
from their app to the network. Since any use of the network
necessarily involves threads, there are a variety of ways this could
occur.
Most of the ways with which I'm familiar utilize methods where the
communication between the
, served up by a content provider (most of
the time anyway, when I need simple automatic cursor-based re-query).
-- K
2015-02-21 2:10 GMT+03:00 Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com:
The main hypothesis I'm wondering about is how developers pass data
from their app to the network. Since
On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 4:39:32 AM UTC+3, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
I agree, that sounds like a useful pattern. I *think* that's
relatively close to how Volley is implemented (though I haven't read
the implementation fully), too.
Do you have any pointers to open sourced code
,
Kris
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:13 PM, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Kristopher Micinski
krismicin...@gmail.com wrote:
I was
wondering if there were any other patterns that app developers used
that I hadn't thought about,
Use a library like Volley
I am trying to get an idea of what most developers use to interact
with web services.
The two main patterns I see in apps is to either create:
- Create an AsyncTask to make restful requests, and then do
something with `onPostExecute`, or to
- Create a service, and then have some API between
to the user what the app is
doing, and to queue up tasks when necessary.
-- K
2015-02-19 23:30 GMT+03:00 Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com:
Right, that's a good point I did not mention.
I'm interested in knowing what percentage of apps use a framework like
this rather than facilities
I would suspect in the example you listed, the developers simply
replaced their images and sprites with new ones and made minor (if
any) programming changes.
I don't think there's anything explicitly in the rules that disallows
this: people offer reskinned version of their apps (or design packs)
I think the answer to your question is no: it wouldn't be that helpful
from a memory footprint perspective to simply kill the service: memory
allocation happens at the process level. For this to be useful, the
service would have to be killed out in some heuristic way, then some
GC would have to
Usually push notifications should be fast enough.
They should be on the order of seconds. If you need something faster
the only way I can think of that might possibly improve speed is a
connection to the server that remains open: but I would highly doubt
that it would really improve anything
.
On Sunday, November 16, 2014 12:07:40 AM UTC+1, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Matat Deltot gar...@gmail.com wrote:
-Security: At robbery scenario , the thief can disable al radios at the
lock
screen, so i cannot call to check nearby people, or locate via device
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Matat Deltot garf...@gmail.com wrote:
-Security: At robbery scenario , the thief can disable al radios at the lock
screen, so i cannot call to check nearby people, or locate via device
manager.
They can also just take out the battery.
Kris
--
You received
To be honest, I don't think you can successfully retrieve the browser
history anymore.
First, many users don't use the stock browser included on most devices, and
second, I think the permission for retrieving history and bookmarks has
been long deprecated. Sucks.
Kris
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at
FYI the video you linked to is pretty offensive...
Kris
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Terry terb...@gmail.com wrote:
Most of the past two months I have spent trying to get various publishers of
antivirus software and apps to remove my app from their lists of malware.
Which was much harder
from someone who was Java only for many (9) years.
2014-05-12 16:30 GMT+08:00 Doug beafd...@gmail.com:
Please, just stop. You are arguing with a fool!
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 10:30:22 PM UTC-7, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
What are you even talking about: Any JavaScript program is also
First of all, this is just downright false, JS *will* be slower than
Java, but I'll address each of your points.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:51 AM, 李白|字一日 calid...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the reply.
but i may think differently.
javascript runtime can be shared, and no new memory
Everything you are saying here is
I have heard Java is slow, and that's what is probably making Android
slow! Here's an example of some things I think are slow because of
Java. Now I'm going to apply this as evidence to the entire Android
platform to show why Java must be slow on it.
Please
I don't get your point: Java needs a runtime. JavaScript needs a
runtime. Both of them need runtimes. He never said Dalvik was
slow, but everything can be optimized. Does native code run faster
than interpreted / JIT code? Probably. The *exact same thing* is
going to be an issue with
What are you even talking about: Any JavaScript program is also going
to have threads, too.
You seem to be making this argument: Java has multiple threads, and
that makes the programs slow.
It sounds like all of this is coming from a completely uneducated
viewpoint on systems design, but there
I have no idea why you think that using Java is slow and memory
consuming: especially when so many apps are being complied to native
code and the framework is getting better by the month.
FYI anything on JavaScript is going to require even *more* memory,
since the runtime of a JavaScript library
I remember doing this last year, I had to unlink some of the GL
drivers to get things to go through... I used a testing suite which
did GUI interaction and had no need to use UI.
Kris
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Charles charles.wh.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks,
Yeah, it does work if I
One big reason is that a lot of time is spent in system libraries,
which are written in C/C++. I believe in the original talk on Dalvik,
it was indicated that 70% of the time was spent in non-interpreted
code. You also have to remember that Dalvik has a JIT compiler and now
an LLVM based runtime
In some cases, the location just isn't available all the time. What
happens if the user goes indoors, out of cell range, etc...? Then
getting a fix just won't work.
Kris
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Shukla rahul12.shu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am developing an android
I seriously doubt that any video editing API exists for Android,
specifically given that finding video manipulation APIs is already
difficult, and most of them probably use huge amounts of heap space
and native code. Your best shot would probably be to take an API and
try to make it work on
Generally there aren't any APIs that will let you access information
about other applications. This is mostly for security reasons. So
the answer to your question is no.
Kris
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 3:00 AM, 12169 ashish.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have an application in which i open the
the enemy is the google
timeless words, so succinctly elucidated, captivating in a single sentence.
Kris
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Build Account newandroi...@gmail.comwrote:
STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
1.implement billing client into any app. and register subscription product
in dev
There isn't really a systematic way to add a library to the system in the
same way that you can install a DLL on most systems.
Instead, in Android, you can expose certain API hooks through AIDL, which
might be what you want.
It's almost certain that you don't want to add a library to the system,
FYI your app shares a name almost verbatim with another very popular app,
which may likely own a trademark on it.
You should check to make sure you're not in violation of that trademark if
you continue to keep your app out...
Kris
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:54 AM, mc maqiut...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, no, I'm wrong, it turns out you also work for that company too, reading
the comments on your Google+ link. Apologies.
Kris
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com
wrote:
FYI your app shares a name almost verbatim with another very popular app,
which
This seems nice, but I would recommend putting the API specs online (e.g.,
a JavaDoc dump...).
And as a matter of professionalism, you should correctly format your source
examples :-)...
Kris
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Eric Ang ang...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I recently joined
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 3:33 AM, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Heshan Perera
anthonyheshanper...@gmail.com wrote:
I know the advice to tackle this situation is to request an online login
but, for an application that does not require web connectivity
I don't have any information on this particular issue, but if anyone did,
they would have pointed it out. I pointed you at various other resources
which may be more helpful than the Android development list. In particular,
this list relates to app development. While asking about issues which
FYI this is why full app encryption exists in Jelly Bean.
DRM is a moving target, you could always imagine a user which roots the
device and copies the APK out of memory (though this would be pretty
technically involved...). So while no perfect solution exists, full app
encryption definitely
You should really stop acting rude if you want anyone to help you. First
you said you bumped an issue to which nobody responded (which is fine,
within reason), but all you seem to do is argue. I already gave you an
accurate answer, acting rude makes you even less likely to get a response,
and if
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 7:02:27 PM UTC+1, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
I don't think you understand what that word means, or at the very least,
you're using it incorrectly :-).
Google engineers respond to a very small amount of questions on this list
that concern core functionality
+1, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
Google engineers routinely read and comment on the contents of
messages from this group, so I would suspect the answer is yes..
Krs
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:12 AM, BoD bodl...@gmail.com wrote:
PING.
On Monday, December 2, 2013 11:18:35 PM UTC+1, BoD
Google engineers routinely read and comment on the contents of
messages from this group, so I would suspect the answer is yes..
Krs
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:12 AM, BoD bodlu...@gmail.com wrote:
PING.
On Monday, December 2, 2013 11:18:35 PM UTC+1, BoD wrote:
Ping.
--
You received this
I don't see why this would be at all problematic. It seems completely
within the guidelines that says this is a bad idea. The Cloud Save
API is just that, an API: so I'd use it however it worked best for
you!
Kris
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Sheado chad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Android,
This is JavaScript, which probably isn't what Desan wants..
Kris
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:54 PM, 장시영 siro...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
A Prototype of Mobile Client for E-commerce Application
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/233818/A-Prototype-of-Mobile-Client-for-E-commerce-Applic
/training/cloudsave/conflict-res.html
I'm also concerned that if it doesn't meet their quality guidelines, then it
would not be considered for featuring.
Maybe I'm being paranoid =] but then again, maybe i'm not
-Chad
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kristopher Micinski
krismicin
a set of features
and meet certain guidelines.
We're probably not going to get featured =/ but might as well shoot for the
stars and do things the way they want =]
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Kristopher Micinski
krismicin...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhh.
Hate to break it to you
The short answer is that you should ask a lawyer.
I have never heard of an app writer being sued for this kind of app,
but I wouldn't be surprised if their had been a lawsuit. In the US you
can sue someone for a pretty huge array of things.
It's probably pretty safe to assume that the answer to
Just as a note: you're being fairly condescending to people who are
suggesting solutions to you free of charge in a pretty polite way..
I personally don't know what the semantics of the swipe away are: but
I wouldn't be surprised if it were to kill the app. I am not sure
whether or not I'd call
They have to be stored somewhere on the phone: but they don't have to
be accessible to you. I believe in this case they are *not* available
through any public API...
Kris
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Chacon cuban...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I was looking to create just a simple app to
You might want to have a look at this system, which does record and replay
for a fairly large set of apps:
http://www.androidreran.com/
Kris
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, 12169 ashish.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In android i want to make an application that can do automated testing of
In general you can't control very much, but sendevent will help...
http://ktnr74.blogspot.com/2013/06/emulating-touchscreen-interaction-with.html
Kris
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 4:47 PM, 12169 ashish.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i want to do this on other applications.
On Sunday, December 1,
Can you get any response from ADB?
Kris
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:52 AM, peter gottlieb gottlieb...@gmail.comwrote:
Bad guess. I clearly stated that the windows 7 setup had already worked
with the Sony Erickson, but now doesn't. For all PC-phone interactions
(browse files on the phone
, but Eclipse android plug in won't even
recognize the hardware phone.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Kristopher Micinski
krismicin...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you get any response from ADB?
Kris
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:52 AM, peter gottlieb
gottlieb...@gmail.comwrote:
Bad guess. I clearly
wouldn't be able to see the phone from PC connect.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Kristopher Micinski
krismicin...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean, if you type in adb devices do you get any output to indicate
that ADB can find your device?
Kris
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:27 AM, peter gottlieb
Has anyone faced the problem of their app working on one device and
crashing on another? Absolutely. For so many reasons that there is no way
to be able to tell what your problem could possibly be.
You should install a crash reporting system in your app, so that when it
does generate crashes
I doubt that will happen.
Translating from Dalvik to native code is tuned to make sense, but
switching to another ABI would be more difficult. It may happen,
though I doubt it will anytime soon.
There's no reason that you can't interface to binaries through JNI
anyway, as long as they follow
Mukesh is right on this one.
Stress testing your server won't be any different than testing any
other sort of server. Just create a dummy that simulates what an
Android device would do and throw thousands of requests at it.
Ideally, if you're using some sort of service (e.g., Rails) you should
It seems that something like this would do the trick:
http://www.miniinthebox.com/bluetooth-master-uart-board-wireless-transceiver-module-uart-interface-host-mode_p394547.html?currency=USDlitb_from=paid_adwords_shoppinggclid=CJbo1KSwwboCFdGe4AodKzQAzQ
It's got a UART interface and lets you stick
Your question seems more to deal with intention rather than
complaining. I believe that Nobu's response was merely interpreting
the implementation and trying to interpret it, so there's no use in
trying to complain at him for providing a guess at something he didn't
even write.
kris
On Wed,
, October 30, 2013 8:23:46 PM UTC+2, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
Your question seems more to deal with intention rather than
complaining. I believe that Nobu's response was merely interpreting
the implementation and trying to interpret it, so there's no use in
trying to complain at him
, October 30, 2013 10:27:03 PM UTC+2, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
I would honestly suspect that it's meant to be this way, and perhaps
the documentation is buggy. If you want, posting a bug report might
get some action by Android devs, if none of them respond here.
Kris
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Piren gpi...@gmail.com wrote:
A foreground service is sort of the way you build apps that live
indefinitely.
I wouldn't say that, foreground services die like everything else... they
are persistent little buggers, but it doesn't take much to get rid of them.
none of that use case makes sense anyway.
kris
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Piren gpi...@gmail.com wrote:
A foreground service is sort of the way you build apps that live
indefinitely.
I wouldn't say
UTC+3, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
For example, having a foreground services shows some sort of intent that
users want the app to be running continuously. If the user force kills an
app with a foreground service, that just seems dumb, since they should have
just stopped it using the facilities
I do all my development via command line, using the ant build scripts and
emacs JDEE works well enough. What joe131 wrote is just a thin wrapper
around all of that anyway,
Kris
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Mark Phillips
m...@phillipsmarketing.bizwrote:
I cannot answer for joe131, and I
If you want continuous location updates you generally want a foregrounded
service anyway...
Kris
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Abhilash Baddam
abhilash.androiddevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to track the User current location continoulsy till he s
In my app there are two
That's right, and I highly doubt you really want continuous location
updates anyway.
If you really do, then you do want this architecture. A foreground service
is sort of the way you build apps that live indefinitely.
Kris
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:41 PM, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some severe doubts that unpackaging would include rewriting on the
device side in standard AOSP, simply because it's open source and that
unpackaging code is publicly available and people can easily snoop it to
see what's happening. Instead, the typical use case for this is rewriting
at
This doesn't have anything to do with Android. If you want to authenticate
the user before allowing them to download the file, then simply put the
download link behind an authentication gateway.
Kris
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Pankaj Deshpande
pcdeshpande...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks
You can ask for the last known location.
Kris
On Oct 5, 2013 3:33 PM, HImanshu Mittal himanshu5...@gmail.com wrote:
But Sir I have a question than ,
How a blue dot is availaible at the position where I am , but the function
is not able to fetch the data than...
??
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at
at 1:17 AM, Kristopher Micinski
krismicin...@gmail.com wrote:
You can ask for the last known location.
Kris
On Oct 5, 2013 3:33 PM, HImanshu Mittal himanshu5...@gmail.com wrote:
But Sir I have a question than ,
How a blue dot is availaible at the position where I am , but the
function
If the stores do this, they probably say so in their TOS, it seems legally
dubious to modify your app without your consent.
Kris
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Richard Schilling coderroa...@gmail.comwrote:
It's possible that some stores will modify your app to add some Digital
Rights
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Richard Schilling coderroa...@gmail.comwrote:
I think you're right Kristopher that there is something in the TOS. But,
seeing as how we all know Google can decompile any app it gets anyway I
think there's also something in the TOS that binds Google to
I guess the problem is, if your location is unavailable, how are you
expecting that that will be fixed? This doesn't make any sense, if it's
not available, it's not available,
Kris
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:16 AM, HImanshu Mittal himanshu5...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello friends,
I have just
and test your code.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Kristopher Micinski
krismicin...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the problem is, if your location is unavailable, how are
you expecting that that will be fixed? This doesn't make any sense, if
it's not available, it's not available,
Kris
FYI:
http://www.malgenomeproject.org/
https://github.com/chadrem/market_bot
Kris
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Moutaz Alazab azabk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Is there any automatic method for downloading Android applications from
Google market directly to my PC, I want to do
So the obvious question that comes to mind is: why do you need to do
this within Eclipse, rather than using an Android testing framework.
Are you talking about whether or not the user *physically* created the
code, rather than testing it actually worked?
I would give a word of warning against
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Anirvan anirvan.majum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Kris,
Appreciate your response.
Even I have an inkling that trying to write some plugin might just end up
being something *big*. However, what we need to establish is whether a
particular user was able to
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, September 20, 2013 1:25:08 PM UTC-4, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
There are specific clauses in the TOS for Play (at least) that stipulate
you can't write apps that could compete with Google apps, under which I
presume this use would fall.
I haven't seen
I doubt such a thing exists, because I doubt Google would be very happy
with you using their protocol for an app.
There are specific clauses in the TOS for Play (at least) that stipulate
you can't write apps that could compete with Google apps, under which I
presume this use would fall.
Kris
Specifically, since app execution happens with the context of a Dalvik VM,
it doesn't make any sense to hook in a static library. Your application is
not being run as a native process, but rather by proxy of being in the VM.
The VM forks from a zygote process, and it makes sense to call
Alljoyn seems to be a helpful API. Doing these p2p BT / wifi overlays is a
real pain, and I'd highly recommend against it if possible. Most people
sync to a central server which mediates games, but if you feel hell bent on
doing it I suppose you could hack it up.
(I've made something like this
killing an app, not exactly the same thing.
On Saturday, September 7, 2013 1:28:05 AM UTC+3, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
You should read this thread:
http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/2033914/quitting-an-**
application-is-that-frowned-**uponhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/2033914
You should read this thread:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2033914/quitting-an-application-is-that-frowned-upon
Kris
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:46 PM, ashish ashish.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
what is best why to exit android application ?
i found difficulty to exit android application
I agree with Michael. It would be easy, but at the same time it's pretty
hard to get background services correct when they need to be constantly
available polling the internet. E.g., it's pretty easy to kill battery
life doing this.
The reason people use GCM is because it does the hard work in
I think they're a vestigal holdover from when in app billing didn't exist
and these things weren't really enforced, but you can feel free to email
them if you'd like clarification.
Kris
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Keith Wiley kbwi...@gmail.com wrote:
Fair enough. Thanks for the info.
That's fair,
http://appflood.com/blog/list-of-mobile-ad-networks-february-2013
gives a pretty comprehensive list...
Kris
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:31 PM, limtc thyech...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks pal. I am just afraid of putting all the eggs in one basket. I have
a popular simple app with a
:
Thanks. Could you suggest a third party alternative ?
I have searched for it without success.
I am developing a chat. I have a Node.js Socket.io server implementation.
Regards,
2013/8/12 Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com
Not in the SDK to my knowledge. But what are you trying
You don't close the application, you can finish() the activity, however.
Kris
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:00 AM, passer passer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I have application which should be ask password on start.
I done it so. onCreate MainActivity calls(startActivityForResult)
1 - 100 of 1992 matches
Mail list logo