Thanks for the fast answers!
Unfortunately I found out, that I can't use AsyncTask for my task
anyway...
The get() method seems to provide a neat way to pseudo-join the
AsyncTask and the main UI-thread - I found it yesterday evening, too,
and played around with it a little bit. The only problem
instead of joining threads... u need to use a handler and a thread... n keep
sending msgs from the thread to the handler...
the handler jus reads the message say for the amt of progress n updates d
progress bar accordingly...
i think this mght help u... jus try it out...
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at
How about copying the AsyncTask code into your app and modifying to do what
you want? I think this is a lot cleaner than going to contortions to work
around the API to use it in ways that probably aren't intended.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Sven Bendel ben...@cs.uni-bonn.de wrote:
AsyncTask uses a thread pool behind the scenes, and assumes it has
control over the threads. I don't think it's a good idea to join them,
etc.
There is a get() method that lets you wait for the computation to
complete. Is that what you want?
You have to make a thread sleep in the context of
You could call setAsyncThread(Thread.currentThread()) inside/during
the AsyncTask's doInBackground method, likely at the start of the
doInBackground.
You'd create the public and synchronized methods setAsyncThread and
getAsyncThread yourself as part of the AsyncTask's subcllass.
On Jun 14, 7:14
5 matches
Mail list logo
