[android-developers] Re: Dalvik and BOOTCLASSPATH

2008-11-25 Thread Koush
Ahh, I see. Thanks for the heads up on that documentation. I had looked at the dexopt source and it looked like that libraries in the boot class path were restricted to being in dependency order... so that basically shoots down my idea of overriding class loading. On Nov 16, 10:26 pm, fadden

[android-developers] Re: Dalvik and BOOTCLASSPATH

2008-11-25 Thread Koush
Also, I've tried just pushing a vanilla framework.jar and framework- apk.jar (as built from the source) to the emulator. This didn't work at first. I found that it was looking for EGLImpl, and then pushed lib/ libandroid_runtime.so to the phone to fix it, and though it worked, most of the

[android-developers] Re: Dalvik and BOOTCLASSPATH

2008-11-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Queru
The issue of internet access on the emulator built from the open-source tree was resolved a while back, but you need to do a clean build and wipe data for it to stick. JBQ PS: this discussion is falling on the side where it should probably continue on one of the open-source lists (e.g.

[android-developers] Re: Dalvik and BOOTCLASSPATH

2008-11-17 Thread fadden
On Nov 14, 1:37 pm, Koush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From adb shell on the emulator, I am prepend the BOOTCLASSPATH to include a jar that contains an implementation of android.widget.EditText. This won't work. Generally speaking, it's not a good idea to try to change the bootstrap class path.

[android-developers] Re: Dalvik and BOOTCLASSPATH

2008-11-14 Thread shyamal
I don't know about the BOOTCLASSPATH, but did actually run the jar through dx --dex etc? On Nov 14, 1:37 pm, Koush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From adb shell on the emulator, I am prepend the BOOTCLASSPATH to include a jar that contains an implementation of android.widget.EditText. Then from