Caution: IANAL
I believe you were already in violation of Google's terms when you opted to
use a payer system outside of Google Wallet. The new terms just clarify it.
To me, it removes all doubt that you can get away with bypassing the Google
Play terms.
There shouldn't be any doubt as to
Fair enough. Thanks for the info. That leaves me rather confused though.
What is the point of third party systems like MobFox? How do they work?
Is their entire business model predicated on hoping confused developers
such as myself will accidentally violate the Google TOS? That strikes me
I think they're a vestigal holdover from when in app billing didn't exist
and these things weren't really enforced, but you can feel free to email
them if you'd like clarification.
Kris
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Keith Wiley kbwi...@gmail.com wrote:
Fair enough. Thanks for the info.
WAIT. Oh man am I confused. I'm sorry. I use MobFox for my in-app ads
(as opposed to whatever ad system Google supports, AdMob I believe), but my
in-app purchases are processed using Google. Yeesh!
In fact, IIRC, I coded up both MobFox and AdMob ads and can switch to use
either, both, or
Like I said in an earlier response, I was confusing in-app ads and in-app
purchases. This entire thread (my original question) is essentially
invalid. Please disregard. Sorry.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to
5 matches
Mail list logo
